1997
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024341
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing Determinants of Bureaucratic Discretion: An Experiment in Street-Level Decision Making

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
126
1
14

Year Published

2001
2001
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 161 publications
(154 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
7
126
1
14
Order By: Relevance
“…Such tools have been used in welfare programs as a deliberate means of social control and disciplining of the poor, especially minorities (Soss, Fording, and Schram, 2011), and a central theme of street-level bureaucracy research is how the characteristics of claimants shape the decisions of bureaucrats. For example, Scott (1997) uses an experimental design to show that the level of organizational control and client characteristics matter to bureaucratic use of discretion in assigning benefits.…”
Section: Application Compliance Burdenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such tools have been used in welfare programs as a deliberate means of social control and disciplining of the poor, especially minorities (Soss, Fording, and Schram, 2011), and a central theme of street-level bureaucracy research is how the characteristics of claimants shape the decisions of bureaucrats. For example, Scott (1997) uses an experimental design to show that the level of organizational control and client characteristics matter to bureaucratic use of discretion in assigning benefits.…”
Section: Application Compliance Burdenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An excellent review by Scott (1997) finds that discretion varies with organizational factors, characteristics of the decisionmaker, and aspects of the decision (such as type of clientele). This study will focus on the organizational element in discretion.…”
Section: Structure and Discretionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some organizations rely heavily on socialization (Kaufman 1960), others stress a common educational background or training (Mintzberg's 1979 professional bureaucracy), and others rely strongly on the supervision and hierarchy. Scott (1997) links rules, "red tape," and procedures to the extent of discretion. Mintzberg, in particular has paid a great deal of attention to control and suggests that methods of control vary greatly across different types of organizations.…”
Section: Structure and Discretionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Michael Lipsky (1980) coined the phrase "street-level bureaucrat" to describe the discretionary power used by front-line public employees to determine how they apply rules and distribute resources. Since then, scholars of public administration have acknowledged discretion is crucial to the operation of public organizations and point out that discretionary use of power has been established as essential within the American political system (Brudney et al, 2000;Kennedy, 2013;Meier & Bohte, 2001;Scott, 1997;Selden et al, 1998;Sowa & Selden, 2003).…”
Section: Discretionary Authoritymentioning
confidence: 99%