2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2015.05.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing daylight performance in atrium buildings by using Climate Based Daylight Modeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(30 reference statements)
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result of the analysis of the annual energy consumption according to the seven building shapes, it was determined that the H shape of the building in the Texas climate zone had the highest energy consumption among all the shapes studied [11,15]. (2) Natural lighting: Through an in-depth analysis of the sun's altitude, the amount of daylight, etc., many researchers have conducted various studies on how to determine the optimal orientation of a building and on designing the atrium from the perspective of introducing the natural light system for nZEB implementation (refer to Table 2) [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28]. First, there are various studies related to determination of the optimal orientation of a building for reducing the building energy demand [16][17][18][19][20].…”
Section: Part A-1: Passive Sustainable Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As a result of the analysis of the annual energy consumption according to the seven building shapes, it was determined that the H shape of the building in the Texas climate zone had the highest energy consumption among all the shapes studied [11,15]. (2) Natural lighting: Through an in-depth analysis of the sun's altitude, the amount of daylight, etc., many researchers have conducted various studies on how to determine the optimal orientation of a building and on designing the atrium from the perspective of introducing the natural light system for nZEB implementation (refer to Table 2) [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28]. First, there are various studies related to determination of the optimal orientation of a building for reducing the building energy demand [16][17][18][19][20].…”
Section: Part A-1: Passive Sustainable Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to an individual house's optimal orientation, the mean of planning that considers the optimal building orientation at a community level was analyzed to more effectively reduce the annual energy cost [19]. Second, various studies have been carried out for efficient atrium design because the atrium shape is a very important factor in natural lighting [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28]. Nasrollashi et al (2015) assessed the impact of the atrium-to-total building area ratio in terms of the energy efficiency and indoor environmental conditions, using the DesignBuilder software program.…”
Section: Part A-1: Passive Sustainable Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Archsim and EnergyPlus were used to calculate energy consumption, which makes it easier to change the simulation inputs, such as the material and its thickness. DIVA was developed at Harvard University [26] and distributed by Solemma LLC [27], which has been used to carry out a series of daylighting analyses, including climate-based daylighting metrics, annual and individual time step glare analysis, etc. Eventually, Octopus, an evolutionary optimization tool, was used to perform the multiobjective optimization.…”
Section: Parametric Simulation Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The basic sunshine duration calculation algorithm of Sanalyst is the same as that of Radiance or Diva for Rhino [13][14][15][16][17]. To run Sanalyst, the analysis factors, including the building and ground were used as geometrical forms.…”
Section: Daylight Availability Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%