2017
DOI: 10.3390/s17112664
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing Crop Coefficients for Natural Vegetated Areas Using Satellite Data and Eddy Covariance Stations

Abstract: The Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO) method for potential evapotranspiration assessment is based on the crop coefficient, which allows one to relate the reference evapotranspiration of well irrigated grass to the potential evapotranspiration of specific crops. The method was originally developed for cultivated species based on lysimeter measurements of potential evapotranspiration. Not many applications to natural vegetated areas exist due to the lack of available data for these species. In this paper … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
3
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This indicates that the accuracy of the crop coefficient method will be considerably lower than that of shown (Figure 9), in line with several studies (Corbari et al, 2017;de Araújo et al, 2017;Odhiambo & Irmak, 2012 Yan and Shugart (2010), which relates RH and potential ET to actual ET. In parallel with their work, decades of research has been devoted to validate the Bouchet's CR hypothesis since the CR is proven to be valid on any timescale such as half-hourly (Zhu et al, 2016), daily (Kim et al, 2019), 8-day (Yan & Shugart, 2010), or annually (Brutsaert et al, 2020).…”
Section: Arem Versus the Crop Coefficient Methodssupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This indicates that the accuracy of the crop coefficient method will be considerably lower than that of shown (Figure 9), in line with several studies (Corbari et al, 2017;de Araújo et al, 2017;Odhiambo & Irmak, 2012 Yan and Shugart (2010), which relates RH and potential ET to actual ET. In parallel with their work, decades of research has been devoted to validate the Bouchet's CR hypothesis since the CR is proven to be valid on any timescale such as half-hourly (Zhu et al, 2016), daily (Kim et al, 2019), 8-day (Yan & Shugart, 2010), or annually (Brutsaert et al, 2020).…”
Section: Arem Versus the Crop Coefficient Methodssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…This indicates that the accuracy of the crop coefficient method will be considerably lower than that of shown (Figure 9), in line with several studies (Corbari et al, 2017;de Araújo et al, 2017;Odhiambo & Irmak, 2012 (Zhu et al, 2016), daily (Kim et al, 2019), 8-day (Yan & Shugart, 2010), or annually (Brutsaert et al, 2020). This will put forward the assumption that there must be a physical meaning behind the interactions found in this study; thus, an attempt for its understanding as a future work is strongly encouraged.…”
Section: Arem Versus the Crop Coefficient Methodssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…K c is defined as the ratio between the actual evapotranspiration from a crop field and the environmental evaporative demand [3]. One of K c estimation's most reliable sources is vegetation indices (VIs) derived from optical remote sensing [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. Until recently, this method's application was hampered by the insufficient amount of public domain imagery at a high revisit time with fine spatial resolution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Crop coefficients for grasses, pines, and beeches were derived from a critical review of the available literature [9,22]. e results of this operation are summarized in Table 2.…”
Section: Data Usedmentioning
confidence: 99%