Assessing Creativity Specific to Engineering with the Revised Creative Engineering Design Assessment

Abstract

BACKGROUNDIn engineering, creativity is vital for innovation. The revised Creative Engineering Design Assessment (CEDA) also assesses Usefulness, unlike existing tools. PURPOSE (HYPOTHESIS)The primary purpose was to test for convergent validity of the CEDA with other engineering creativity and engineering specific measures. The CEDA was administered with the Purdue Creativity Test (PCT), the Purdue Spatial Visualization Test-Rotations (PSVT-R), and a Systems Test that assessed rollercoaster design functionality. We hypothesized that the CEDA would be moderately related to the PCT and anticipated a slight relationship with the PSVT-R and Systems Test. We also investigated gender differences to follow up on previous research. DESIGN/METHODParticipants were 259 engineering students (221 males and 38 females) in an introductory engineering design two-course sequence who completed the CEDA and PCT (in a cross-sectional design). We analyzed PVST-R scores for Fundamentals of Engineering I and Systems Test scores for Fundamentals of Engineering II. RESULTSThe CEDA showed high inter-rater reliability. The CEDA and the PCT were significantly related to each other and the CEDA was modestly related to the PSVT-R, both demonstrating convergent validity. Male and female engineering students did not significantly differ on the CEDA, PCT, PSVT-R or Systems Test. CONCLUSIONSThe CEDA has convergent validity with the PCT, which was normed on engineers in industry (12 years average experience), and with the PVST-R, measuring spatial skills. Findings and previous research suggest that the CEDA is domain specific to engineering. Future CEDA research is needed involving engineers in industry.

A Meta-Analysis Study on the Effectiveness of Creativity Approaches in Technology and Engineering Education

“…According to Charyton et al (2011), greater emphasis has been given on increasing creativity in upcoming engineers due to the importance of creativity in engineering as profession. Cropley & Cropley (2000) raised a similar issue of fostering creativity in engineering education.…”

Interdisciplinarity between design and engineering: Case study: The development of a classroom chair for children ages 6–10

“…Currently, the Design is increasingly seen as a sector that deals mainly with creating products for functional purposes but integrating also aesthetic features, in order to attract and, at the same time, to respond to the user needs [3,5,6].…”

“…In order to achieve this objective, the area of Industrial Design needs to draw on other complementary disciplines, such as Engineering, Ergonomics, Material Science, inter alia, as it would not be impossible to build or conceive this type of products in isolation [5,7].…”

Exploring the Relationship between Empathy and Innovation among Engineering Students

“…We describe innovative design as the act of generating novel concepts, processes, or designs. Innovative design is closely linked to creativity, 6 using and implementing creative ideas to develop something tangible, real, or meaningful in a societal context. This type of innovation may be described as incremental, leading to small changes, or radical, leading to a complete rethinking of existing practices and designs, or generating entirely new concepts altogether.…”