Weekly creatinine clearance (Ccr) and Kt/V are accepted worldwide as parameters for evaluating peritoneal dialysis (PD) dose or adequacy. However, these parameters require collection of daily urine and peritoneal effluent for calculation, and their weak correlations with either survival or morbidity rate have been revealed in previous reports [1,2].Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was originally developed for estimating glomerular filtration rate in predialysis patients, and most of the equations were based on the compared analysis of patient characteristics, i.e., age, sex, and creatinine, with glomerular filtration rate obtained by inulin or iohexol clearance. Hence eGFR will become a marker for the filtration function of the kidney and the peritoneum equivalent to GFR in predialysis patients, and become a more concise alternative for the evaluation of PD dose and adequacy, because urine and peritoneal effluent collection can be omitted in its calculation.We surveyed 28 maintenance PD patients (18 men and 10 women) at JA Toride Medical Center. Their causes of renal failure were diabetes mellitus (13/28), chronic glomerulonephritis (11/28) and other causes (4/28). The exposure period of the patients to PD was 2-124 months (29.0 ± 32.4 mean ± SD). The equation for eGFR, modified for Japanese population and proposed by the Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Guide of Japanese Society of Nephrology (JSN), was calculated as below.eGFR ¼ 0:741  175  age À0:203  Cr À1:154 ðÂ0:742 only in womenÞ:According to the established methods, total Ccr was calculated as the sum of urinary and peritoneal Ccr. Kt/V and serum cystatin C level were also compared with eGFR.As Fig. 1 shows, eGFR was well correlated with total Ccr (r = 0.836) and 1/cystatin C (1/cystatin C = 0.01 9 eGFR ? 0.11, r = 0.792, p \ 0.01), but not with Kt/V (r = 0.226, p = 0.25). We also examined the correlation of a new eGFR (194 9 Cr -1.094 9 age -0.287 9 0.739 in women) developed by JSN [3] with total Ccr; however, the correlation coefficient was less (r = 0.799) than that of the former eGFR with total Ccr. In 25/28 cases, the levels of eGFR were lower than that of total Ccr, which was anticipated from the original report [3]; eGFR was originally estimated from inulin clearance that excluded an overestimation factor of Ccr derived from creatinine secretion in tubules.Among candidate parameters for estimating PD dose and adequacy, eGFR did not seem more accurate than Ccr and Kt/V in predicting small solutes clearance, but the fact that eGFR can be calculated without urine and peritoneal effluent collection must be worthwhile in routine clinical practice of PD therapy. As reported by the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equations [4,5], more extensive and longterm studies will be needed to clarify eGFR, as proposed by JSN, as a new marker in the evaluation of PD dose and adequacy, because the simplicity of eGFR will be valuable in studies requiring huge sample sizes or the cooperation of multiple medical facilities.