2000
DOI: 10.1139/f00-007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing covariability among populations in the presence of intraseries correlation: Columbia River spring-summer chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) stocks

Abstract: We assessed covariability among a number of spawning populations of spring-summer run chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) in the Columbia River basin by computing correlations among several different types of spawner and recruit data. We accounted for intraseries correlation explicitly in judging the significance of correlations. To reduce the errors involved in computing effective degrees of freedom, we computed a generic effective degrees of freedom for each data type. In spite of the fact that several… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies focusing on longer time series of smolt-adult return rate and adult returns have found support for climate teleconnections (Beamish & Bouillon, 1993;Mantua et al, 1997;Lawson et al, 2004;Scheuerell & Williams, 2005). Nevertheless, our results consistently showed that in the Lemhi River, flow variables had stronger explanatory power than climate predictors, corroborating some studies that have detected higher covariation in life-cycle production at subbasin rather than basinwide scales (Schaller et al, 1999;Botsford & Paulsen, 2000;Deriso et al, 2001). Studies that have included flow as well as climate signals in the context of the life cycle have also shown strong effects of flow (e.g., Greene et al 2005).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Previous studies focusing on longer time series of smolt-adult return rate and adult returns have found support for climate teleconnections (Beamish & Bouillon, 1993;Mantua et al, 1997;Lawson et al, 2004;Scheuerell & Williams, 2005). Nevertheless, our results consistently showed that in the Lemhi River, flow variables had stronger explanatory power than climate predictors, corroborating some studies that have detected higher covariation in life-cycle production at subbasin rather than basinwide scales (Schaller et al, 1999;Botsford & Paulsen, 2000;Deriso et al, 2001). Studies that have included flow as well as climate signals in the context of the life cycle have also shown strong effects of flow (e.g., Greene et al 2005).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…A sequential Bonferroni correction (29) was applied to adjust significance levels for multiple comparisons. Because LOWESS smoothing will produce spatially autocorrelated data (regional trends), the effective degrees of freedom for significance tests of cross-correlations can be lower than the standard tests (30,31). Therefore, significance values close to 0.05 should be taken with caution.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This assumption is more appropriate for long-distance dispersal than straying between neighboring subpopulations. For salmon (and other homing fish) environmental factors such as stream temperature, flow rates, and food supply are likely to be more correlated between neighboring stocks (Botsford and Paulsen 2000). Analysis of classical metapopulation models have shown that spatially correlated environmental stochasticity potentially reduces mean extinction times (e.g., Levins 1969;Gilpin 1990;Hanski 1991).…”
Section: Diffusion Theory For a Stochastic Metapopulation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%