2017
DOI: 10.1086/691281
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing Contextual Measurement Strategies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
25
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
3
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because subjective socioeconomic status depends to a great extent on features of an individual's local context, studies conducted at relatively high levels of aggregation may mask important variation, and our evidence appears to support this idea (Velez and Wong, 2017). Most observational studies of local inequality use measures at relatively high levels of geographic aggregation, such as U.S. states (Franko, 2016(Franko, , 2017, counties (Newman et al, 2015;Cheung and Lucas, 2016;Solt et al, 2017;Newman et al, 2018), municipalities (Phillips, 2017;van Holm, 2019), or zip codes (Johnston and Newman, 2016;Page and Goldstein, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…Because subjective socioeconomic status depends to a great extent on features of an individual's local context, studies conducted at relatively high levels of aggregation may mask important variation, and our evidence appears to support this idea (Velez and Wong, 2017). Most observational studies of local inequality use measures at relatively high levels of geographic aggregation, such as U.S. states (Franko, 2016(Franko, , 2017, counties (Newman et al, 2015;Cheung and Lucas, 2016;Solt et al, 2017;Newman et al, 2018), municipalities (Phillips, 2017;van Holm, 2019), or zip codes (Johnston and Newman, 2016;Page and Goldstein, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 51%
“… 13 Scholars have used everything from respondent-created boundary maps to government geo-indicators like census tract and county to measure social context (DeSante and Perry 2016; Wong et al 2012; Stolle, Soroka, and Johnston 2008). However, recent work by Velez and Wong (2017) shows that, across an array of measures, zip code most closely approximates people’s perceptions of the racial composition of their “local” community. In fact, zip code even outperforms respondent-constructed boundary maps.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, Newman et al (2015) show that residents "receive the treatment"-that is they correctly perceive the number of immigrants as well as the economic conditions of their local community when compared against census measures at the ZIP Code and county levels. 3 Velez and Wong (2017) provide the most insightful study to date regarding the relationship between census measured context and perceived context. They find a strong positive relationship between census measured racial and ethnic composition and perceived racial and ethnic composition, but only when using one's ZIP Code as a boundary.…”
Section: Towards a More Unified Measure Of Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If this is the case, then it is imperative that scholars understand for whom and under what conditions residents receive the contextual stimuli from their surroundings. While Velez and Wong (2017) show that respondents accurately perceive contextual stimuli at one census measured boundaries (ZIP Code), their study is in some ways limited by the use of a general population sample through MTurk. 1 And yet, much of the work that examines context and contextual factors considers racial and ethnic minority groups explicitly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%