2001
DOI: 10.1080/095006901750066501
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing conceptual change of teachers involved in STES education and curriculum devleopment - the STEMS project approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0
5

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
29
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Why or why not? Table 3: Shows the score and scheme answers to students' reasoning (Zohar and Nemet, 2002;Tal et al, 2013) This outcome in line with some other findings that show that Malaysian students in schools and universities is weak in scientific reasoning skills. The results of this study shown Malaysian students has less capable of high level scientific reasoning than students in the United States.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Why or why not? Table 3: Shows the score and scheme answers to students' reasoning (Zohar and Nemet, 2002;Tal et al, 2013) This outcome in line with some other findings that show that Malaysian students in schools and universities is weak in scientific reasoning skills. The results of this study shown Malaysian students has less capable of high level scientific reasoning than students in the United States.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…To analyze scientific reasoning questions to students, rubric analysis submissions in complex reasoning have been implemented (Tal et al, 2013;Zohar and Nemet, 2002). Table 3 shows the scored and scheme answers for student reasoning.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several researchers have highlighted these difficulties in the SSI approach (e.g., Cross & Price, 1996;Geddis, 1991;Lumpe, Haney, & Czerniak, 1998;Solomon, 1988;Tal, Dori, Keiny, & Zoller, 2001). However, the recognition of these dilemmas does not represent an insurmountable barrier to change science education, but a challenge that needs to be overcome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Teachers do not usually make radical changes, however, but proceed by successively incorporating and putting into practice the ideas that seem to them important and approachable, and that in time they come to regard as positive (Arora et al 2000). Such change is usually slow, but steady and gradual (Appleton and Asoko 1996;Tal et al 2001). It also rarely involves the complete abandonment of their existing educational models in favour of new ones, but rather consists of acquisitions with partial retention (Gunstone and Northfield 1994;Valca´rcel and Sa´nchez 2000).…”
Section: Models Of Gradual Change Through Internal Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%