Assessing Competencies and Proficiency of Army Intelligence Analysts Across the Career Life Cycle

Lytell, Maria C.; Straus, Susan G.; Serena, Chad C.; Grimm, Geoffrey E.; Doty, James L.; Wenger, Jennie W.; Abler, Andrea M.; Naber, Andrew M.; Grammich, Clifford A.; Fowler, Eric S.

doi:10.7249/rr1851

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 73 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…They differ from those related to measurement and evaluation. 34 Lytell et al, 2017;Pulakos et al, 2002;Straus et al, 2014. 35 Round 2 SME interviewee #8 explained that in situations in which individuals repeatedly fail to independently demonstrate task proficiency, the C&Es should "come back to the training department and relay that information for use at future training Academy sessions.…”

Section: Course Of Action Recommendationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Identifying Gaps and Areas for Improvement in the FEMA Qualification System for Incident Workforce Positions: Recommendations for Developing an Improvement and Evaluation Process

2024

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This report documents research and analysis conducted as part of a project entitled Identifying Gaps and Areas for Improvement in the FEMA Qualification System for Incident Workforce Positions, sponsored by the Integration Branch of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) within the Workforce Development Division of the Field Operations Directorate. The findings should be of interest to FEMA, given that the purpose of the project was to identify gaps and challenges in assessing the current state of the FEMA Qualification System (FQS) and provide recommendations that will allow FEMA to evaluate and improve FQS.

show abstract

Section: Course Of Action Recommendationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…a SeeLytell et al, 2017, andStraus et al, 2014, for examples of question formats for self-efficacy. Each cadre would need to populate the task statements in this format.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Identifying Gaps and Areas for Improvement in the FEMA Qualification System for Incident Workforce Positions: Recommendations for Developing an Improvement and Evaluation Process

2024

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Main Command Post-Operational Detachments (MCP-ODs) and Division Headquarters Readiness

Dalzell¹,

Schnaubelt²,

Linick³

et al. 2019

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.

show abstract

Assessing Competencies and Proficiency of Army Intelligence Analysts Across the Career Life Cycle

Cited by 2 publications

References 73 publications

Identifying Gaps and Areas for Improvement in the FEMA Qualification System for Incident Workforce Positions: Recommendations for Developing an Improvement and Evaluation Process

Identifying Gaps and Areas for Improvement in the FEMA Qualification System for Incident Workforce Positions: Recommendations for Developing an Improvement and Evaluation Process

Main Command Post-Operational Detachments (MCP-ODs) and Division Headquarters Readiness

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About