2013
DOI: 10.3163/1536-5050.101.1.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing clinical researchers' information needs to create responsive portals and tools: My Research Assistant (MyRA) at the University of Utah: a case study

Abstract: The university's model can assist other librarians and informaticians with how to become part of a CTSA-focused infrastructure for clinical and translational research and serve researchers in general.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A draft survey instrument was developed with questions adapted from the Rhode Island Advance-CTR Needs Assessment [12]. We customized these questions based on published CTR and/or CTSA evaluations to ensure that relevant themes were included [13,14,21]. We invited input on the draft survey from network stakeholders (e.g., network members, pilot award applicants, advisory board members).…”
Section: Stage 1: Pre-assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A draft survey instrument was developed with questions adapted from the Rhode Island Advance-CTR Needs Assessment [12]. We customized these questions based on published CTR and/or CTSA evaluations to ensure that relevant themes were included [13,14,21]. We invited input on the draft survey from network stakeholders (e.g., network members, pilot award applicants, advisory board members).…”
Section: Stage 1: Pre-assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing literature provides important insight into CTR network assessment opportunities; however, important gaps remain regarding the methods to implement participatory needs assessments that prompt CTR network outcome improvement. Typically, researchers have used either surveys or interviews to assess CTR network needs [12][13][14][15][16]. For example, Wiley and colleagues surveyed investigators to characterize those interested in engaging with CTR, barrier identification, and targets for professional development [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participating in projects and partnerships such as those outlined above has always represented a valuable opportunity to challenge one's own knowledge and capabilities and to test how current they are (Reich et al., ). The tasks accomplished, and the collaborations the health information specialists at the ISS have been involved with over the years, have provided opportunity for the group to test their own expertise and more specifically, to go beyond the traditional tasks of day to day health information services provision.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the University of Utah Spencer S. Eccles Health Sciences Library (EHSL), we faced a challenge: the desire to provide SR services with limited capacity to move forward both in terms of staff and faculty expertise and time. We did have numerous advantages, however, including a close relationship with the Center for Clinical & Translational Science (CCTS), established through many joint strategic efforts that were designed to increase the capacity for research on campus [23]. In addition, the university had established multiple core facilities and had already consented to include the EHSL’s Research Information Services on the main University of Utah Health Sciences Center (HSC) Cores website.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%