2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jand.2018.03.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing Clinical Judgment and Critical Thinking Skills in a Group of Experienced Integrative and Functional Nutrition Registered Dietitian Nutritionists

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ability to think critically has become the focus of recent previous researchers in various countries as it is important and interesting to study and develop. They are such as [5] in Portugal, [6] in South Africa, [7] in Egypt, [8] in Thailand, [9][10][11] in America, [12] in Australia, and [13] in Canada. These previous researchers conclude that critical thinking is the focus of the important ability development that each individual needs in facing global challenges.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ability to think critically has become the focus of recent previous researchers in various countries as it is important and interesting to study and develop. They are such as [5] in Portugal, [6] in South Africa, [7] in Egypt, [8] in Thailand, [9][10][11] in America, [12] in Australia, and [13] in Canada. These previous researchers conclude that critical thinking is the focus of the important ability development that each individual needs in facing global challenges.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…similar to those reported in the representative sample from the 2017 Compensation and Benefits Survey of the Dietetics Profession. 23,24 The Overall CCTDI score for the 92 participants with valid scores was 317.2 ± 27.1. The mean of each subscore for critical thinking dispositions fell into the Positive score classification, with the highest subscore in inquisitiveness and the lowest subscore in truth-seeking (Table 3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rich account of the nature of clinical judgement offered in the present study suggests that clinical judgement is not interchangeable with concepts currently used in the dietetics literature, such as critical thinking. To date, the dietetics literature tends to embrace critical thinking as a key construct representing the cognitive process in the nutrition care process (10) and research is dominated by attempts to measure its presence in practice (17,45,46) using established concept definitions from other fields (47) . Instead, the present study positions critical thinking as one of the various cognitive strategies needed in dietitian CDM and therefore the term 'clinical judgement' should not be used interchangeably with it.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That study adopted a definition of judgement ( 16 ) which assumed there are right and wrong judgements for prioritising referrals, reinforcing an empirico‐analytical approach to decision making. Another study has conducted an assessment of experienced functional and integrative nutrition professionals’ critical thinking skills ( 17 ) using both qualitative and quantitative content analysis against known critical thinking models ( 18 ) and the NCPM. That study identified the common use of inductive reasoning lending to the role of judgement for managing uncertainty.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%