2000
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2214.2000.00150.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing children's and teenagers' bereavement when a sibling dies from cancer: a secondary analysis

Abstract: The purposes of this paper are to: (1) provide conceptual and empirical descriptions of the most frequently reported children's and teenagers' responses in anticipation of and after the death of a sibling from cancer; (2) describe these behaviours by age groups (3-5, 6-11 and 12-19 years); and (3) discuss the clinical utility of two new scales measuring children's bereavement. The literature review and an exploratory secondary analysis from a prospective longitudinal design were used to develop the empirical c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
38
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
3
38
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05 for acceptance in the enter model. were between 19 and 23 years (mean = 24.0, SD = 3.8, range [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33] at the time of investigation. The average time since loss was 6.3 years (range 2-9, SD = 2.3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05 for acceptance in the enter model. were between 19 and 23 years (mean = 24.0, SD = 3.8, range [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33] at the time of investigation. The average time since loss was 6.3 years (range 2-9, SD = 2.3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was also reported that 16% of the siblings had not worked through their grief 7-9 years after the death. Birenbaum [20] assessed behaviour problems in children and adolescents up to 1 year after they had lost a sibling to cancer and reported that the bereaved children and adolescents had more behavioural problems than the normative sample. There was also an apparent age difference in the types of symptoms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, infants’ and children’s NICU or PICU deaths may be abrupt and frightening, in environments of loud noises, bright lights, and staff who are strangers (Brooten et al 2013). In addition, research in this area had small samples (Erlandsson et al 2010; Warland et al 2011), mainly White participants (Birenbaum 2000; Gerhardt et al 2012), a wide age range of children in the samples and methodological weaknesses. Most data were collected on parents’ perceptions of surviving children’s responses which often differ from children’s own responses (Lohan and Murphy 2001–2002; Roche et al 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recent reviews confirm this status (Currier et al 2007a, Rosner, 2010. Thus, individualised assessment of each child is crucial to establish the problems associated with the death, to review their individual strengths and resiliencies and to decide on the therapeutic support/interventions required to help them deal with such problems (Birenbaum, 2000). The efficacy of specialist psychotherapy and mental health services for those children with complex grief reactions has been demonstrated (Currier et al 2007, Rosner 2010.…”
Section: Bereavement Support and Services For Children And Young Peoplementioning
confidence: 98%
“…In developing the Pyramid and its supporting document, the ICBN worked on the premise that individualised consideration of each child is crucial to establish the challenges associated with the death of their loved one and the responses and therapeutic support/interventions appropriate to help them deal with such problems (Birenbaum, 2000).…”
Section: Iinsert Figure Four About Here Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%