2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0885-2006(01)00094-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing child-care quality with a telephone interview

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
3

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
20
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, recent research with the revised version of the scale yielded only one factor (Holloway et al, 2001). In addition, in a sample of higher quality facilities, Perlman et al (2004) did not support the seven aspects of quality identified by the subscales.…”
Section: Previous Factor Analytic and Scale Reduction Techniques For mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, recent research with the revised version of the scale yielded only one factor (Holloway et al, 2001). In addition, in a sample of higher quality facilities, Perlman et al (2004) did not support the seven aspects of quality identified by the subscales.…”
Section: Previous Factor Analytic and Scale Reduction Techniques For mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of factor analysis techniques to reduce the scale can also provide insight into underlying unique dimensions of quality rather than a single global indicator. Several factor analyses have been completed on the both the original ECERS (Harms & Clifford, 1980;Howes, Phillips, & Whitebook, 1992; Phillipsen, Bruchinal, Howes, & Cryer, 1997;Scarr et al, 1994) and the revised version (Holloway, Kagan, Fuller, Tsou, & Carroll, 2001;Perlman, Zellman, & Le, 2004;Sakai, Whitebook, Wishard, & Howes, 2003) with different results. Limited sample sizes in these past studies have not permitted both exploratory and confirmatory factor analytic techniques to be used.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this study, we found the total score reliability to be .91, with reliability on the subscales ranging from .53 (Personal Care Routines) to .89 (Activities). Higher scores on the ECERS and/or ECERS-R have been found to be positively correlated with teacher's education (Cassidy, Buell, Pugh-Hoese, & Russell, 1995;Holloway, Kagan, Fuller, Tsou, & Carroll, 2001;Howes, Whitebrook, & Phillips, 1992), and several child outcomes, including better cognitive linguistic, and communicative performance (Burchinal et al, 2000a(Burchinal et al, , 2000bPeisner-Feinberg & Burchinal, 1997), and better math skills (Burchinal et al, 2000a;Peisner-Feinberg et al, 2001). …”
Section: Early Childhood Environment Rating Scale-revised Editionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this study, we found the total score reliability to be .71. Scores on the FDCRS have been shown to be associated with structural measures of quality such as group size (Holloway et al, 2001), ratios (Kontos, Howes, Shin, & Galinsky, 1995), teacher education (Fiene et al, 2002;Holloway et al, 2001), and training (Kontos, Howes, & Galinsky, 1996). Higher scores have also been shown to be related to the use of a curriculum (Fiene et al, 2002).…”
Section: Family Day Care Rating Scalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Encouragingly, recent research revealed a high level of agreement between carer-report and direct observation of child care quality. 33 Secondly, we used parent report measures to assess children's self-regulation which are likely subject to measurement error. However, we were interested in examining children's ability to regulate attention, emotion and behaviour in their everyday lives rather than their capacity to regulate as measured by objective assessments of children's regulatory capabilities.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%