The evaluation of intervention effects is an important objective of educational research. One way educational systems can improve is through the systematic implementation of products, policies, practices, and programs that quality research has identified as successful. The process of evaluating educational interventions can be a daunting task. Within the Institute of Educational Sciences, there are entire organizations dedicated to this effort. For example, the What Works Clearinghouse and Regional Education Labs exist primarily to evaluate educational interventions and report on their effectiveness.One important issue related to the evaluation of an educational or instructional intervention is quantifying the amount of learning that has occurred. In order to quantify learning, there must be measures in place to assess student learning before and after the intervention. Often, this is completed via a pretest/posttest designed study. For each examinee, the difference in performance on the pretest and posttest can be interpreted as the amount of learning that the examinee has achieved. In educational settings, using statistical models to examine change in student knowledge over time is often referred to as growth modeling and has been studied at length in a variety of psychometric contexts.In a classical test theory framework, the difference in pretest and posttest total scores, referred to as a gain score, is often interpreted as a quantification of examinee learning (Williams & Zimmerman, 1996). Though they are simple to calculate and interpret, gain-score-based approaches to measuring growth can result in 32