2016
DOI: 10.1038/srep19529
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing cellular and circulating miRNA recovery: the impact of the RNA isolation method and the quantity of input material

Abstract: MicroRNAs (miRNAs) have emerged as promising cancer biomarkers. However, exploiting their informative potential requires careful optimization of their detection. Here, we compared the efficiency of commonly used RNA extraction kits in miRNA recovery from cells, plasma and urine/plasma-derived exosomes, using single-gene RT-qPCR and miRNA profiling. We used increasing amounts of starting material to investigate the impact of the input material size on miRNA extraction. We showed that miRNA recovery was largely … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
129
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 145 publications
(135 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(67 reference statements)
6
129
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, isolates from different methods were reproducibly enriched in fragments of additional short non-coding RNA classes such as tRNA. We have used two different RNA extraction kits in this study, and varying combinations of EV isolation and RNA extraction methods might yield slightly different results [5,52]. However, based on the vastly different characteristics of the material captured by each method, we believe that EV isolation itself has a far greater impact on downstream RNA analysis than the respective extraction method (Figure 6).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, isolates from different methods were reproducibly enriched in fragments of additional short non-coding RNA classes such as tRNA. We have used two different RNA extraction kits in this study, and varying combinations of EV isolation and RNA extraction methods might yield slightly different results [5,52]. However, based on the vastly different characteristics of the material captured by each method, we believe that EV isolation itself has a far greater impact on downstream RNA analysis than the respective extraction method (Figure 6).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For normalization purposes, 3.5 µl of a synthetic Caenorhabditis elegans miR-39 was spiked in after lysis before the preparation of the samples. RNA yields isolated from plasma were insufficient for proper quantitation with, for example, a NanoDrop spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Wilmington, Del., USA) [28]. Therefore, as recommended in the literature in this setting [18], equal volumes of RNA, rather than equal amounts of RNA, were used as input in the reverse transcription reaction.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We purified total RNA from testis and injected a quantity corresponding to the amount found in one spermatid (50 pg) to embryos generated with sperm. TRIzol was used to isolate RNA as it allows the recovery of RNA in a broad range of sizes (El-Khoury et al 2016). All embryos generated in that way developed normally, indicating that testicular RNAs are not detrimental to embryonic development (Supplemental Fig.…”
Section: Developmentally Important Genes Are Misregulated In Spermatimentioning
confidence: 99%