2009
DOI: 10.1038/nrc2677
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing cancer risks of low-dose radiation

Abstract: Ionizing radiation is considered a non-threshold carcinogen. However, quantifying the risk of the more commonly encountered low and/or protracted radiation exposures remains problematic and subject to uncertainty. Therefore, a major challenge lies in providing a sound mechanistic understanding of low-dose radiation carcinogenesis. This Perspective article considers whether differences exist between the effects mediated by high- and low-dose radiation exposure and how this affects the assessment of low-dose can… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
121
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 181 publications
(123 citation statements)
references
References 106 publications
1
121
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Because the extension of the penumbra increases with particle velocity, tissues exposed to very high-energy ions, such as those in space or used in therapy, will experience hotspots of high doses and large volumes with low dose exposure. Controversy surrounding the effects of low doses persists (2,47,48), but our results support the view that every exposure to charged particles should be considered a 3D entanglement of high-dose and low-dose DNA damage induction in tissues.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Because the extension of the penumbra increases with particle velocity, tissues exposed to very high-energy ions, such as those in space or used in therapy, will experience hotspots of high doses and large volumes with low dose exposure. Controversy surrounding the effects of low doses persists (2,47,48), but our results support the view that every exposure to charged particles should be considered a 3D entanglement of high-dose and low-dose DNA damage induction in tissues.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…7,8 While many factors may influence the cellular response to low-dose radiation exposure, our studies demonstrated that the environmental oxygen concentration is an element of critical importance. Considering the fact that the principle mode of IR action is through induction of ROS, 9 it is not surprising that the effects of low-dose IR, mediated by a moderate level of ROS, can be profoundly affected by oxygen concentration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Since the direct biological consequences of low-dose irradiation are relatively subtle and difficult to measure, 7,8 we opted to study the radioadaptive response model to investigate the effects of low-dose radiation because animal studies have demonstrated such adaptive response. 6 We define doses at or below 0.1 Gy as low-dose radiation, 7 equivalent to the upper limit dose from a full-body spiral CT scan 8 and 2-4 Gy as high-dose radiation that causes substantial DNA damage to cells, 9,23 4 Gy is close to the LD50 for human whole-body exposure.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the risk of cancer due to the prolonged low-dose radiation exposure has not been proven consistently. This may be contributed by several factors: individualization of radiation dose is difficult, the background radiation is omnipresent, the radiation-induced cancers are biologically indistinguishable from other extrinsic/intrinsic cancers, the risk of intrinsic cancer is high relative to low projected risk of radiation-induced cancer, and appropriate observational number of the subjects with cancers related to low-dose radiation is difficult (Brenner et al, 2003;Mullenders et al, 2009). Nevertheless, excess relative risks for cancers have been reported among workers in the nuclear power Mao-Chin Hung 1 *, Jeng-Jong Hwang 2 plants and residents in the radiocontaminated buildings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%