2008
DOI: 10.1644/07-mamm-a-022.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing Bat Detectability and Occupancy with Multiple Automated Echolocation Detectors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
59
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bat activity is often assessed by the number of bat passes (i.e., files recorded by bat detectors; Hayes, 1997) however this metric is susceptible to the arbitrary partitioning of potentially continuous activity (Gorresen et al, 2008). We quantified the magnitude of echolocation activity by determining the number of calls (or pulses) recorded at each site for each night using Analook (Hayes, 2000).…”
Section: Call Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Bat activity is often assessed by the number of bat passes (i.e., files recorded by bat detectors; Hayes, 1997) however this metric is susceptible to the arbitrary partitioning of potentially continuous activity (Gorresen et al, 2008). We quantified the magnitude of echolocation activity by determining the number of calls (or pulses) recorded at each site for each night using Analook (Hayes, 2000).…”
Section: Call Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We quantified the magnitude of echolocation activity by determining the number of calls (or pulses) recorded at each site for each night using Analook (Hayes, 2000). The use of the number of calls directly measures the magnitude of calling activity and may be less prone to measurement error caused by missed calls (e.g., bat detector orientation and distance, ambient noise; Gorresen et al, 2008) and is similar to that of using file size as a measure of activity (Broders, 2003).…”
Section: Call Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resulting false absences (species is present but not detected; MacKenzie, 2005) may influence results and inferences unless accounted for in analyses (Gu and Swihart, 2004). Because bats are imperfectly detected and detection may be influenced by habitat characteristics, occupancy modeling has recently been applied to acoustic surveys for bats (Amelon, 2007;Gorreson et al, 2008;Hein et al, 2009;Weller and Baldwin, 2012;Yates and Muzika, 2006). Occupancy modeling allows simultaneous investigation of factors influencing occupancy and detection probabilities, improving the ability to make inferences about species use of landscape features (MacKenzie et al, 2002;MacKenzie, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, bat detectors can detect more species at a site than capture techniques (Murray et al 1999;O'Farrell and Gannon 1999). Further, ultrasonic detectors can be deployed to passively record the echolocation calls of bats without an observer present, thereby allowing a small crew to sample multiple sites simultaneously and for long periods of time (e.g., Gorresen et al 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%