Stevens' Handbook of Experimental Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience 2018
DOI: 10.1002/9781119170174.epcn111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing Autobiographical Memory

Abstract: Autobiographical memory is notoriously difficult to study in the laboratory because it involves many different cognitive processes and is subject to several “real‐world” factors. It is imperative that we understand the processes involved in autobiographical memory given that these processes are affected in several conditions, such as depression and dementia, and they are critical for a variety of daily life functions. We review established models and assessments of autobiographical memory as well as recent adv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 211 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, our findings complement previous investigations using the AI, which report increases in external details in aging and neurodegenerative disease (for review, see Sheldon et al, 2018). Here we show that, in aging and in FTD/SD patients, this increase is specific to semantic details, as initially envisaged by Levine et al (2002) using the original AI scoring scheme.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Overall, our findings complement previous investigations using the AI, which report increases in external details in aging and neurodegenerative disease (for review, see Sheldon et al, 2018). Here we show that, in aging and in FTD/SD patients, this increase is specific to semantic details, as initially envisaged by Levine et al (2002) using the original AI scoring scheme.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Forward asymmetry was also positively associated with episodic detail richness, but this association was driven by reduced external details. Excessive external details reflect overreliance reliance on semantic information or poor cognitive control (Sheldon et al, 2018). It is possible that external detail interjections interrupt the forward flow of temporal context, truncating memory search.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The balance of internal and external details, measured as the internal-to-total detail ratio, is commonly used to measure the episodic detail richness of autobiographical memories. It reliably differentiates younger from older adults and healthy from episodic memory-impaired populations (Levine et al, 2002;Sheldon et al, 2018), while controlling for individual differences in verbosity. Younger adults had considerably higher internal detail proportions than older adults (t(22.03) = 3.05, p < .001, d = 1.35), replicating the established negative effect of age on episodic detail richness (Levine et al, 2002; see Figure 2B).…”
Section: Detailsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…semantic, metacognitive, or unrelated) (Levine, Svoboda, Hay, Winocur, & Moscovitch, 2002). Here, older adults retrieve fewer internal details and more external details, a pattern that is exaggerated with DETAIL AND TEMPORAL STRUCTURE IN NATURALISTIC EVENT RECALL 5 hippocampal dysfunction, reflecting reduced episodic re-experiencing (Levine et al, 2002;Sheldon et al, 2018). But as autobiographical events are typically sampled retrospectively, and are therefore heterogeneous and unverifiable, their recall dynamics typically cannot be mapped to the encoded event dynamics.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%