2010
DOI: 10.1007/s12603-010-0263-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing attitudes and behaviours surrounding Alzheimer's disease in Europe: Key findings of the important perspectives on Alzheimer's care and treatment (IMPACT) survey

Abstract: The Important Perspectives on Alzheimer's Care and Treatment (IMPACT) survey is an assessment in Europe of the attitudes of caregivers, physicians, the general public and payors towards Alzheimer's disease and dementia. This was an Internet-based questionnaire study, which sought to determine the opinion and perception of responders on issues relating to ageing and dementia. There were additional questions for caregivers on the impact of caregiving on their life. Responses were analysed from 949 members of the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
37
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(38 reference statements)
3
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two studies used a combination of representative and convenience sampling (Cody et al, 2002, Kaduszkiewicz et al, 2008a, one study used a 'market research' sample but how this was sourced was not clear (Jones et al, 2010). Participation rates ranged from 15% to 100%.…”
Section: Quantitative Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Two studies used a combination of representative and convenience sampling (Cody et al, 2002, Kaduszkiewicz et al, 2008a, one study used a 'market research' sample but how this was sourced was not clear (Jones et al, 2010). Participation rates ranged from 15% to 100%.…”
Section: Quantitative Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beneficial to receive a timely diagnosis GPs 43% (Milne et al, 2005) GPs 45% (Milne et al, 2000) GPs 52% (Renshaw et al, 2001) GP 85% (Fox et al, 2014) Telling person with dementia usually more helpful than harmful Hospital general practitioners 54% (Pathak and Montgomery, 2015a) GPs 65% (Turner et al, 2004) GP 70% (Fox et al, 2014) Telling diagnosis and prognosis does more harm than good (rated from 1 to 6) GPs mean 2.4± 1.3 Specialists mean 2.3 ±1.2 (Kaduszkiewicz et al, 2008a, Kaduszkiewicz et al, 2008b Limited benefits to diagnosis AD/Dementia is untreatable GP 5% (Fox et al, 2014) No point diagnosing dementia because support not available GP 29% (Fox et al, 2014) Early detection of dementia has no therapeutic consequences (rated from 1 to 6) GPs mean 1.9 ± 1.3 Specialists mean 1.7 ± 1.2 (Kaduszkiewicz et al, 2008a, Kaduszkiewicz et al, 2008b PWD can be a drain on resources with little positive outcome Hospital general practitioners 39% (Pathak and Montgomery, 2015a) Confident making PCP 34% (Rubin et al, 1987) Confidence in diagnosis and management diagnosis GP 52% (Downs et al, 2000) Hospital general practitioners 67% (Pathak and Montgomery, 2015a) GPs 73% (Vassilas and Donaldson, 1998) Difficulty with early detection GPs 39% (Olafsdottir et al, 2001) Difficulty with early detection Diagnostic capacity (rated 1-10) PCPs 59% specialists 30% (Jones et al, 2010, Martinez-Lage et al, 2010) GPs mean 6.2 ± 2.0 (Gaboreau et al, 2014) Not confident telling patient GP 41% (Downs et al, 2000) 70 Communicating a diagnosis of dementia Not confident telling family GP 21% (Downs et al, 2000) Confident in providing advice in managing dementia Hospital general practitioners46% (Pathak and Montgomery, 2015a) Managing dementia is more often frustrating than Hospital general practitioners 55% …”
Section: Communicating a Diagnosis Of Dementiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generalists (n=250) included general practitioners, hospital general physicians, family physicians and internists; specialists (n=250) included neurologists, geriatricians, neuropsychiatrists, psychiatrists and psychogeriatricians. For a complete description of each respondent group and the survey methodology see the article in this issue by Jones, et al (19).…”
Section: Jnha: Clinical Neurosciencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, black, minority, Asian and ethnic communities (BAME) in the UK face greater barriers to earlier diagnosis because of poor access to information tailored to specific language needs and/or cultural perspectives (APPG, 2013). At a European level, the quality of diagnostic and care services for younger and older people with dementia are unevenly distributed on a geographical basis (Jones, Mackell, Berthet, & Knox, 2010) and pathways to care lack integration and systematic evaluation (Mukadam, Cooper, & Livingston, 2011). Examining how social, cultural and service-related factors mediate recognition of dementia and service access is important in initiating effective change for individuals and/or communities who are behind the curve of earlier diagnosis and timely care and support.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%