2006
DOI: 10.1017/s0165070x06001719
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing Asylum Claims in Africa: Missing or Meeting Standards?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As stated, the empirical material informs our quest to develop an alternative theoretical understanding of body politics in the context of asylum interviews. Similar studies of the link between the institutional logic of the assessment of asylum applications and body politics do exist (see, for example, Abuya and Mukundi, 2006; Bögner et al, 2010; Bohmer and Shuman, 2007; Eades, 2009; Kelly, 1993; Shuman and Bohmer, 2004; Thomas, 2006; Wettergren and Wikström, 2014; Wikström, 2014). However, most of those studies either focus on the experiences of asylum seekers or rely on analyzing verdicts or adjudication procedures omitting the interpersonal and corporeal dimensions that nonetheless lie at the core of the evaluation process (but see Coutin, 2001; Granhag et al, 2005).…”
Section: The Theory and Practice Of Asylum Interviews As Communicative Actsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…As stated, the empirical material informs our quest to develop an alternative theoretical understanding of body politics in the context of asylum interviews. Similar studies of the link between the institutional logic of the assessment of asylum applications and body politics do exist (see, for example, Abuya and Mukundi, 2006; Bögner et al, 2010; Bohmer and Shuman, 2007; Eades, 2009; Kelly, 1993; Shuman and Bohmer, 2004; Thomas, 2006; Wettergren and Wikström, 2014; Wikström, 2014). However, most of those studies either focus on the experiences of asylum seekers or rely on analyzing verdicts or adjudication procedures omitting the interpersonal and corporeal dimensions that nonetheless lie at the core of the evaluation process (but see Coutin, 2001; Granhag et al, 2005).…”
Section: The Theory and Practice Of Asylum Interviews As Communicative Actsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Ei-kielellistä viestintää ja sen merkityksiä puhutteluissa on käsitelty pääasiassa liittyen uskottavuuden arviointiin ja menettelyn taustalla vaikuttaviin käsityksiin tiedosta (esim. Herlihy & Turner 2009;Magalhaes 2016;Abuya & Mukundi 2006;Bögner ym. 2010;Bohmer & Shuman 2007;Eades 2009;Kelly 1993;Shuman & Bohmer 2004;Thomas 2006;Wettergren & Wikström 2014;Wikström 2014).…”
Section: Turvapaikkapuhuttelu Tutkimuskontekstinaunclassified
“…Reasons must thus be given by the information holder, and the requestor informed. 122 The yardstick for determining whether an outcome satisfies the requirements of a decision is whether the reasons clearly demonstrate that an information holder has applied legal principles to the request (Abuya and Mukundi, 2006). 123 This is a requirement in several countries.…”
Section: The Procedural Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%