2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2016.01.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing aortic regurgitation severity from 2D, M-mode and pulsed wave Doppler echocardiographic measurements in horses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
44
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because indices of LV size were included in the AR severity scoring system used to classify AR severity, it is logical that these indices would be different among the AR severity subgroups. The extent of LV enlargement in the AR severity subgroups was similar to that recently reported in other studies assessing the severity of AR using echocardiographic measurements . However, it is also clear that horses with severe AR show signs of LA enlargement indicating the hemodynamic relevance of severe AR resulting in increased preload of both the LV and LA.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Because indices of LV size were included in the AR severity scoring system used to classify AR severity, it is logical that these indices would be different among the AR severity subgroups. The extent of LV enlargement in the AR severity subgroups was similar to that recently reported in other studies assessing the severity of AR using echocardiographic measurements . However, it is also clear that horses with severe AR show signs of LA enlargement indicating the hemodynamic relevance of severe AR resulting in increased preload of both the LV and LA.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Horses in the AR group were further sorted according to the severity of regurgitation (mild, moderate, or severe), as judged by a scoring method that included subjective criteria (regurgitant jet size, LV size, and apex shape) as well as objective criteria (LVIV d(500) ). The scoring system was modified from that previously described in that LV volume rather than diameter was evaluated according to current hospital echocardiography standards (see Supplementary Table S1). Three clinicians (Julia Boegli, Colin C. Schwarzwald, Katharyn J. Mitchell), blinded to the previous clinical assessment of the horse, scored each horse, and the average of the 3 scores was used to sort the horses into 3 groups.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Images only were collected with a heart rate (HR) <50 beats per minute. Stroke volume (SV) was calculated as pulsed wave Doppler‐derived aortic velocity time integral (left parasternal view) multiplied by aortic valve cross‐sectional area (right parasternal view) . Cardiac output (CO) was determined as SV × HR.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%