2021
DOI: 10.24818/amp/2021.36-01
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing alternatives to the development of administrativeeconomic units applying the FARE-M Method

Abstract: The socio-economic development of economic-territorial units subordinate to administrative-management institutions appears as one of the main tasks. The values of alternative indicators reflecting socio-economic development may differ, which makes it difficult to unambiguously assess the importance of the indicators. The applied available methods are either too receptive or does not provide sufficient accuracy. The proposed FARE-M methodology for determining the importance of indicators is the prolongation of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It gives only an approximate picture, since one or more significantly different values of the indicator can significantly influence the result of the grouping. This can be avoided by applying non-linear data grouping methods based on non-linear normalization (Ginevičius et al, 2021a).…”
Section: Test Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It gives only an approximate picture, since one or more significantly different values of the indicator can significantly influence the result of the grouping. This can be avoided by applying non-linear data grouping methods based on non-linear normalization (Ginevičius et al, 2021a).…”
Section: Test Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, an entrepreneur is an economic agent with an active behavior, who assumes financial risks to develop new projects that bring him profit (Ginevičius et al, 2021;Yousif et al, 2020;Kosach et al, 2020;Adams, 2020). A study published by Harvard Business School in November 2017, identifies the personality traits of entrepreneurs are as follows: (1) openness to new experiences -are independent, focused on originality and creativity, easily take risks; (2) conscientiousness -entrepreneurs are oriented on the final goal of the action and always complete the tasks; (3) extraversion -entrepreneurs are energetic, optimistic, sociable, characterized by a high level of assertiveness and emotional intelligence; (4) agreeableness -entrepreneurs are altruistic, oriented on community development, modest and trustworthy; (5) neuroticism -entrepreneurs are capable of negative emotions and can become sad, anxious, tense under stress.…”
Section: Introduction and Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the most commonly used methods for determining the weight of indicators is the direct weighting method. This method can be used successfully when the total number of indicators is small (Ginevičius et al, 2021). In this work, the direct weighting method was used to determine the weights of the subindices of the economic, social, technological, and political environment.…”
Section: Selected Methods For Evaluating Factors Influencing the Shar...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, Ginevičius et al, (2021) proposed the FARE-M method, an extension of the FARE method. The FARE-M method was improved to obtain initial expert information (Ginevičius et al, 2021).…”
Section: Selected Methods For Evaluating Factors Influencing the Shar...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation