1997
DOI: 10.15288/jsa.1997.58.106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing Alcohol Problems: A Guide for Clinicians and Researchers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Definitions of significant alcohol exposure vary, but consumption of six or more drinks per week for more than 2 weeks or three or more drinks on two or more occasions can be considered a guideline for determining significant alcohol consumption (82). Additional history of significant alcohol consumption can also be obtained from documentation of social or legal problems associated with alcohol use or intoxication during pregnancy (83). Screening for PAE is often an iterative process that may require revisitation and in which a parent who may initially deny use of alcohol during pregnancy, later discloses use in the context of a relationship of trust that focuses upon the wellbeing of the child.…”
Section: Screening For Prenatal Alcoholmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Definitions of significant alcohol exposure vary, but consumption of six or more drinks per week for more than 2 weeks or three or more drinks on two or more occasions can be considered a guideline for determining significant alcohol consumption (82). Additional history of significant alcohol consumption can also be obtained from documentation of social or legal problems associated with alcohol use or intoxication during pregnancy (83). Screening for PAE is often an iterative process that may require revisitation and in which a parent who may initially deny use of alcohol during pregnancy, later discloses use in the context of a relationship of trust that focuses upon the wellbeing of the child.…”
Section: Screening For Prenatal Alcoholmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alcohol drinking was defined as the consumption of more than 14 standard drinks per week for men and more than 7 standard drinks per week for women during the last 6 months. 27 A standard drink was defined as any type of alcoholic drink that contained more than 12 g of pure alcohol. 28 Helicobacter pylori infection was defined as a positive result on either a urea breath test or an immunoglobin G test for H pylori.…”
Section: Covariatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This lack of consensus may be partially due to the absence of a systematic evaluation of existing alcohol scales in terms of their methodological quality and measurement properties. Allen and Wilson's "Assessment of Alcohol Problems" comprehensively evaluated alcohol scales that experts had deemed highly relevant for assessing and treating alcohol problems 6 ; however, the second edition of the book is already 20 years old. Thus, little robust evidence is available for researchers and clinicians to determine their choice of assessment scales in evaluating problems associated with alcohol use, resulting in an arbitrary and inappropriate selection of the populations and settings of their interest.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 screening tests, 22 symptom assessment scales, and three assessment scales for drinking behaviors. They were classified in terms of their purpose to the following seven groups: (1) to screen for alcohol use disorders (n = 10), (2) to assess the severity of alcoholrelated problems, including alcohol use disorders (n = 7), (3) to assess specific symptoms or aspects of alcohol use disorders, such as craving and withdrawal (n = 8), (4) to assess motivation or illness stages during the treatment process (n = 4),(5) to assess alcohol-related problems in special population, including adolescents and pregnant women (n = 6),(6) to quantify alcohol use (n = 3), and(7) to assess the treatment outcome in patients (n = 2). Revised versions were available for three scales (7.5%); however, the original versions were predominantly used with a few exceptions, such as AEQ-A, CIWA-A, and SOCRATES-A.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%