Assessing Agreement between Radiomic Features Computed for Multiple CT Imaging Settings

Abstract

ObjectivesRadiomics utilizes quantitative image features (QIFs) to characterize tumor phenotype. In practice, radiological images are obtained from different vendors’ equipment using various imaging acquisition settings. Our objective was to assess the inter-setting agreement of QIFs computed from CT images by varying two parameters, slice thickness and reconstruction algorithm.Materials and MethodsCT images from an IRB-approved/HIPAA-compliant study assessing thirty-two lung cancer patients were included for the analysis. Each scan’s raw data were reconstructed into six imaging series using combinations of two reconstruction algorithms (Lung[L] and Standard[S]) and three slice thicknesses (1.25mm, 2.5mm and 5mm), i.e., 1.25L, 1.25S, 2.5L, 2.5S, 5L and 5S. For each imaging-setting, 89 well-defined QIFs were computed for each of the 32 tumors (one tumor per patient). The six settings led to 15 inter-setting comparisons (combinatorial pairs). To reduce QIF redundancy, hierarchical clustering was done. Concordance correlation coefficients (CCCs) were used to assess inter-setting agreement of the non-redundant feature groups. The CCC of each group was assessed by averaging CCCs of QIFs in the group.ResultsTwenty-three non-redundant feature groups were created. Across all feature groups, the best inter-setting agreements (CCCs>0.8) were 1.25S vs 2.5S, 1.25L vs 2.5L, and 2.5S vs 5S; the worst (CCCs<0.51) belonged to 1.25L vs 5S and 2.5L vs 5S. Eight of the feature groups related to size, shape, and coarse texture had an average CCC>0.8 across all imaging settings.ConclusionsVarying degrees of inter-setting disagreements of QIFs exist when features are computed from CT images reconstructed using different algorithms and slice thicknesses. Our findings highlight the importance of harmonizing imaging acquisition for obtaining consistent QIFs to study tumor imaging phonotype.

Influence of gray level discretization on radiomic feature stability for different CT scanners, tube currents and slice thicknesses: a comprehensive phantom study

“…Several studies already showed that radiomic feature values are influenced by image acquisition and reconstruction settings, like slice thickness and exposure [2,[9][10][11][12][13]. For instance, Mackin et al [13] scanned a phantom with ten unique inserts using different acquisition parameters on computed tomography (CT) scanners of four manufacturers.…”

Novel Quantitative Imaging for Predicting Response to Therapy: Techniques and Clinical Applications

“…One of the major limitations in quantitative image analysis and radiomics, however, is the wide variability and lack of uniformity across institutions, scanner platforms, 74 slice thickness, 75 reconstruction kernels, 76 other acquisition parameters, and even nodule segmentations. 9,77,78 …”

Effects of MRI scanner parameters on breast cancer radiomics

“…Assessing variability of radiomics features for imaging equipment or its different settings is an important topic and has been studied for non small cell lung cancers in different studies (Lu, Ehmke, Schwartz, & Zhao, 2016; Mackin et al, 2015; Zhao et al, 2016) and in breast MRI based lesion classification (Chen et al, 2010). Repeated CT scans of the same patient in the same day were used to assess reproducibility of a set of feature in (Lu et al, 2016; Zhao et al, 2016).…”

“…Repeated CT scans of the same patient in the same day were used to assess reproducibility of a set of feature in (Lu et al, 2016; Zhao et al, 2016). The study in (Mackin et al, 2015) focused on the comparison of imaging features from patients and phantoms computed using 17 different scans of the phantom (used as ground truth).…”