2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.cogsys.2018.09.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing affective experience of in-situ environmental walk via wearable biosensors for evidence-based design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
21
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
3
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of the six selected studies, three used ANOVA (Banaei et al 2017;Djebbara et al 2019;Yin et al 2019) as the mode of data analysis. REP-Tree (Ojha et al 2019) and Pearson's Correlation Analysis (Horvat et al 2018) were also implemented, with one study (Chen et al 2018) using qualitative data analysis presented in diagrams. From this, it is evident that there is no standard for analysing data and predicting correlations; each study establishes its own parameters and explores the outcomes within the boundaries of its own scope.…”
Section: Comparing Methods Of Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Of the six selected studies, three used ANOVA (Banaei et al 2017;Djebbara et al 2019;Yin et al 2019) as the mode of data analysis. REP-Tree (Ojha et al 2019) and Pearson's Correlation Analysis (Horvat et al 2018) were also implemented, with one study (Chen et al 2018) using qualitative data analysis presented in diagrams. From this, it is evident that there is no standard for analysing data and predicting correlations; each study establishes its own parameters and explores the outcomes within the boundaries of its own scope.…”
Section: Comparing Methods Of Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…None of the studies reports equal numbers of male and female participants, with some disproportionately favouring one of the two groups (Horvat et al 2018;Yin et al 2019). Two studies failed to report on the participants' gender at all (Ojha et al 2019;Chen et al 2018). A larger sample of data needs to be acquired in order to see whether there is even potential in claiming that physiological responses are universal.…”
Section: Population Sample Sizes and Demographicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To date, most physiological studies have primarily assessed the effects of natural environments on cardiovascular measures, such as heart rate, heart rate variability (HRV), and blood pressure [3][4][5]12,[15][16][17][18]; neuroendocrine or metabolic indexes, such as cortisol and adrenaline [5,[19][20][21]; or immune and inflammatory indexes, such as natural killer (NK) cells and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) [5,[22][23][24]. Few studies have assessed the physiological effects of natural environments on electrodermal activity (EDA) or peripheral skin temperature, which directly reflect sympathetic and parasympathetic nervous system activity and have been reliably connected to an individual's mental and emotional state [25][26][27][28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%