Gender in Transitional Justice 2012
DOI: 10.1057/9780230348615_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asserting Their Presence! Women’s Quest for Transitional Justice in Post-Genocide Rwanda

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Women activists there succeeded in having sexual violence categorized as one of the most serious crimes (category 1) in the 1996 Genocide Law instead of as a crime of the same significance as the stealing of nonhuman property (category 4) as was proposed in the draft bill. 6 As indicated in the Introduction, the transfer in 2008 of all genocide rape cases to the Gacaca courts threw up a number of specific obstacles for women to testify against their rapists. 7 For reasons presented in the stories, the women did not expect any positive outcome of speaking out in Gacaca.…”
Section: Justice For Rape Survivorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Women activists there succeeded in having sexual violence categorized as one of the most serious crimes (category 1) in the 1996 Genocide Law instead of as a crime of the same significance as the stealing of nonhuman property (category 4) as was proposed in the draft bill. 6 As indicated in the Introduction, the transfer in 2008 of all genocide rape cases to the Gacaca courts threw up a number of specific obstacles for women to testify against their rapists. 7 For reasons presented in the stories, the women did not expect any positive outcome of speaking out in Gacaca.…”
Section: Justice For Rape Survivorsmentioning
confidence: 99%