2000
DOI: 10.2307/3079152
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assembly Rules: Desert Rodent Communities Are Structured at Scales from Local to Continental

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
52
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
52
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Significant nested patterns have been detected in rodent (Patterson and Brown 1991, Kelt et al 1999, Abu Baker and Patterson 2011 and shrew (Patterson 1990) assemblages. By contrast, non-random co-occurrence patterns consistent with competition theory have been found in rodent assemblages in American deserts and in Egypt (Kelt et al 1999, Brown et al 2000, Abu Baker and Patterson 2011 as well as in shrew assemblages in Australian and North American temperate forests Kirkland 1992, McCay et al 2004). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Significant nested patterns have been detected in rodent (Patterson and Brown 1991, Kelt et al 1999, Abu Baker and Patterson 2011 and shrew (Patterson 1990) assemblages. By contrast, non-random co-occurrence patterns consistent with competition theory have been found in rodent assemblages in American deserts and in Egypt (Kelt et al 1999, Brown et al 2000, Abu Baker and Patterson 2011 as well as in shrew assemblages in Australian and North American temperate forests Kirkland 1992, McCay et al 2004). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…(b) Local rock-reef cichlid communities are randomly distributed Community analyses have traditionally focused on the regional scale [1,3,11], neglecting intermediate scales within locales, perhaps because the data have not been available. Yet, this scale represents an important one, linking (or not) processes that occur at the level of individual territories to patterns apparent across regions [14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies have linked expectations from reduced co-occurrence patterns to empirical verification of species interactions (competition; [8,9]). Studies of community structure have assessed a variety of assemblages including salamanders [9], ants [8,10], desert rodents [11], beetles [12], marine reef fishes [13] and birds [14]. Despite mixed individual results, a meta-analysis of 96 datasets revealed that non-random community structure (lower species cooccurrence) is more common in natural communities than expected [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations