2017
DOI: 10.1080/24694452.2017.1345611
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assembling Enclosure: Reading Marine Spatial Planning for Alternatives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
44
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
1
44
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…First, as other marine social science research has found (Fairbanks et al . ; Gruby et al . ; Steinberg ), oceans are frequently understood as easy or cheap conservation “wins” relative to terrestrial spaces that are permanently inhabited by people and/or widely understood as extractive spaces integral to a nation's economy.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…First, as other marine social science research has found (Fairbanks et al . ; Gruby et al . ; Steinberg ), oceans are frequently understood as easy or cheap conservation “wins” relative to terrestrial spaces that are permanently inhabited by people and/or widely understood as extractive spaces integral to a nation's economy.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Marine Spatial Planning and Large Marine Protected Areas are regularly made central to large‐scale ocean governance initiatives (Fairbanks et al . ; Gruby et al . ).…”
Section: Oceans and Global Environmental Governancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, in recent decades there has been a shift toward enclosure of the oceans by states, along with a rising interest in environmental protection and “rational” management of marine resources (Fairbanks et al . ; Mansfield ; Scott ; Steinberg ). Ocean enclosures include a variety of spatial practices, such as the establishment of 200 nm exclusive economic zones (EEZs), state claims to outer continental shelves, the rapid increase in marine protected areas, and the development of marine spatial planning, as well as aspatial forms of enclosure such as individual transferable quotas for fisheries, a kind of private property in the sea (Mansfield ).…”
Section: Science and The Co‐production Of Territorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although MSP can frame and enact spaces and communities in ways that are far removed from the lived experience of people living on the coast, this is not an inevitable outcome of MSP. Planning tools like MSP, Boucquey et al.. argue, can be 'assembled' differently in ways that destabilize the relationship between planners and coastal communities, while at the same time providing the foundation for a more progressive and hopeful way of living in ocean spaces (also see Fairbanks et al 2017). Bouquey et al's (2015) research is an excellent example of ontological politics and it confirms a point that John Law (2009, 155) has long stressed: he has argued that "reality is not destiny" and that with "great difficulty and effort, what is real can be remade".…”
Section: Poststructural Politicsmentioning
confidence: 99%