2014
DOI: 10.1080/13604813.2014.962881
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assembling disaster: Earthquakes and urban politics in Istanbul

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Drawing upon AT specifically, Angell (2014) analyses the same disaster to show how the risk of earthquakes was reassembled as a natural and existential threat to the population by the government to reinforce the need for national governments to lead DRM initiatives. This reassembly ran counter to popular narratives within civil society that 'earthquakes don't kill people, buildings do', or that the disaster was not natural but the result of poor governance and risky, outsourced urban development (Angell, 2014). Angell explores the reverberations of the disaster through space and time in relation to contestations over urban development by showing that the government deployed imaginations of future earthquakes to pass a 'Transformation of Areas under Disaster Risk law' through parliament.…”
Section: At: Reassembling 'The Virtual' As Futures-in-the-makingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drawing upon AT specifically, Angell (2014) analyses the same disaster to show how the risk of earthquakes was reassembled as a natural and existential threat to the population by the government to reinforce the need for national governments to lead DRM initiatives. This reassembly ran counter to popular narratives within civil society that 'earthquakes don't kill people, buildings do', or that the disaster was not natural but the result of poor governance and risky, outsourced urban development (Angell, 2014). Angell explores the reverberations of the disaster through space and time in relation to contestations over urban development by showing that the government deployed imaginations of future earthquakes to pass a 'Transformation of Areas under Disaster Risk law' through parliament.…”
Section: At: Reassembling 'The Virtual' As Futures-in-the-makingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This came to the fore in the suspicious attitude with which Van's inhabitants engaged with the materiality of their own homes during the weeks and months following the quakes. Such suspicion subjected cracks in particular to ‘anxious scrutiny’ (Angell : 670). ‘Might that crack in the corner not indicate a fundamental instability of the supporting pillar?…”
Section: The Notorious Unruliness Of Ruinsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simpson ). Turkey constitutes by no means an exception in this regard: as anthropologist Elizabeth Angell (: 674–5) has shown, the discourse of Istanbul being a city at particularly high seismic risk has justified sweeping governmental interventions into the city's urban fabric, which often align less with seismic risk zoning than with the interests of neoliberal capital and lucrative urban development plans. Therefore, I shall begin by briefly indicating how the geography of Van and its population have been historically produced as susceptible to bear effects of ruination in particular, what Stoler (: 200) calls ‘patterned’, ways such that seismic and political fault lines routinely come to intersect in this geography.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This process started around the 1950s in Turkey (Kuyucu & Unsal, 2010). The government that is the sole-ruling party in Turkey since the 2000s has attached priority in the activities of reproducing urban spaces considering the disaster risk (Angell, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%