Total Survey Error in Practice 2017
DOI: 10.1002/9781119041702.ch17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aspire

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Undergoing a major design change can simultaneously impact multiple components of total survey error. 20 Comparing differences in base-weighted respondent distributions across the 2 designs offers a glimpse into the combined impacts of differential coverage, nonresponse, measurement, and sampling errors. To that end, we compared base-weighted sociodemographic distributions of respondents to the 2018 and 2020 HCS administrations with estimates of the target population, Chicagoans aged 18 years or older, as derived from the 2014-2018 ACS data file (see Table, Supplemental Digital Content 1, available at http://links.lww.com/JPHMP/A922, which presents respondent characteristics for the ABS and DFRDD samples alongside the population estimates derived from the ACS).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Undergoing a major design change can simultaneously impact multiple components of total survey error. 20 Comparing differences in base-weighted respondent distributions across the 2 designs offers a glimpse into the combined impacts of differential coverage, nonresponse, measurement, and sampling errors. To that end, we compared base-weighted sociodemographic distributions of respondents to the 2018 and 2020 HCS administrations with estimates of the target population, Chicagoans aged 18 years or older, as derived from the 2014-2018 ACS data file (see Table, Supplemental Digital Content 1, available at http://links.lww.com/JPHMP/A922, which presents respondent characteristics for the ABS and DFRDD samples alongside the population estimates derived from the ACS).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That insight is often summarized or communicated through statistical parameters of interest at the population or domain level, including means, quantiles, regression coefficients, measures of variability like variance, or even differences over time. The accuracy of these parameter estimates can be degraded by a variety of issues described in the Total Survey Error context (Biemer 2010; Biemer et al 2017; Groves and Lyberg 2010), including but not limited to coverage error, sampling error, measurement error, and nonresponse error. Under ideal conditions, we could accurately specify the types and magnitudes of each of these error sources and incorporate information about error processes into our design plans for sampling, data collection, weighting, and estimation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%