2003
DOI: 10.1002/art.11056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aspiration and injection therapies for joints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
(60 reference statements)
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Deleterious consequences and other sequelae of corticosteroid injections are frequently a result of chronic use, and may be more prevalent if the corticosteroid spreads to adjacent tissues [8,32,33]. Consideration for systemic consequences are also important, especially for patients with diseases that cause immunosupression (e.g., diabetes mellitus and rheumatoid arthritis) [4,16,17,34,35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deleterious consequences and other sequelae of corticosteroid injections are frequently a result of chronic use, and may be more prevalent if the corticosteroid spreads to adjacent tissues [8,32,33]. Consideration for systemic consequences are also important, especially for patients with diseases that cause immunosupression (e.g., diabetes mellitus and rheumatoid arthritis) [4,16,17,34,35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the relatively large and persistent placebo effects found in trials of knee OA in general, but particularly seen among trials employing intra-articular saline controls, have been recognised as substantial barriers to OA therapeutics,34 including viscosupplements 35. In fact, given that arthrocentesis with or without a saline injection has been recognised as an effective intervention in patients with knee OA presenting with a significant knee effusion,36 some researchers have suggested that intra-articular saline ‘placebo’ injections might better be categorised as active controls rather than as ‘placebos’ 33. As a consequence of the uncertainty generated by these issues, when the results of prior systematic reviews and meta-analyses have been used to generate evidence-based guidelines for the treatment of knee OA, recommendations regarding the use of HA injections have typically been measured.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…lignocaine) because of the risk of clumping and precipitation of steroid crystals. However this remains common practice and provides additional benefits: there is early temporary relief of symptoms; it verifies delivery of steroid to site of pain (66); and it dilutes the suspension, enabling even distribution within the joint, (especially in shoulder joint injections), and hence avoids placement of highly concentrated fluid into a single area. Several randomised controlled trials (67)(68)(69)(70) and one Cochrane systematic review (71) have shown significant short-term efficacy (between 1 to 4 weeks) in terms of pain reduction for a single IA corticosteroid (TCA, MPA and cortivazol) over placebo in knee OA although effects on function appear less marked.…”
Section: Intra-articular Corticosteroidmentioning
confidence: 99%