2017
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170691
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asphyxia in the Newborn: Evaluating the Accuracy of ICD Coding, Clinical Diagnosis and Reimbursement: Observational Study at a Swiss Tertiary Care Center on Routinely Collected Health Data from 2012-2015

Abstract: BackgroundThe ICD-10 categories of the diagnosis “perinatal asphyxia” are defined by clinical signs and a 1-minute Apgar score value. However, the modern conception is more complex and considers metabolic values related to the clinical state. A lack of consistency between the former clinical and the latter encoded diagnosis poses questions over the validity of the data. Our aim was to establish a refined classification which is able to distinctly separate cases according to clinical criteria and financial reso… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
9

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
19
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…The WHO definition is neither predictive of outcome nor does it imply any causation. The ICD-10 categories of P20 “intrauterine hypoxia” and P21 “birth asphyxia” are classified by onset characteristics [26] but do not provide clear diagnostic criteria or threshold values and APGAR scores, fetal acidosis and fetal distress lack specificity. The terms “post-asphyxial encephalopathy” or “hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy” are also used to describe encephalopathy caused due to intrapartum injury [26, 27].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The WHO definition is neither predictive of outcome nor does it imply any causation. The ICD-10 categories of P20 “intrauterine hypoxia” and P21 “birth asphyxia” are classified by onset characteristics [26] but do not provide clear diagnostic criteria or threshold values and APGAR scores, fetal acidosis and fetal distress lack specificity. The terms “post-asphyxial encephalopathy” or “hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy” are also used to describe encephalopathy caused due to intrapartum injury [26, 27].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ICD-10 categories of P20 “intrauterine hypoxia” and P21 “birth asphyxia” are classified by onset characteristics [26] but do not provide clear diagnostic criteria or threshold values and APGAR scores, fetal acidosis and fetal distress lack specificity. The terms “post-asphyxial encephalopathy” or “hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy” are also used to describe encephalopathy caused due to intrapartum injury [26, 27]. However, recent guidelines from the American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology, and International Cerebral Palsy Task Force recommend against the use of these terms unless intrapartum-related causation can be established [27].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…За даними літератури, на зв'язувальну здат ність альбуміну можуть впливати білково жи рове співвідношення молока матері, постна тальна гіпотрофія, а також антибактеріальна терапія дитини або матері. Окрім того, значна кількість субстратів у крові новонароджених, імовірно, конкурує з білірубіном за зв'язок з альбуміном (кальцій, неестерифіковані жирні кислоти, материнські естрогени, кортикостеро їди, антибіотики та інші речовини) [2,11]. Саме тому зниження рівня альбуміну є одним із важливих факторів, які визначають тяжкість перебігу гіпербілірубінемії, що потребує, на наш погляд, подальшого вивчення для уточ нення рекомендації ведення неонатальної жовтяниці.…”
Section: матеріали та методи дослідженняunclassified
“…Coding diagnostic expressions of causes of death (CoDs) according to a standardized nomenclature presents major challenges [16,17]. In most cases, the person in charge of recording the CoD in the death registry is not a health staff member and is instead integrated into a certain social context [18]; in fact, this person uses expressions from popular medical knowledge [19].…”
Section: Background Of the Classifications Of The Causes Of Deathmentioning
confidence: 99%