2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.triboint.2017.08.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asperity level tribological investigation of automotive bore material and coatings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
31
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
2
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One is the pressure coefficient of boundary shear strength, and the other is the reduced (effective) elastic modulus of the contacting surfaces, * ; taking into account the effect of any tribo-film present. This makes a significant difference to the accuracy of predicted boundary friction [30] as it affects the calculated asperity load carrying capacity through equation (9).…”
Section: Nano-scale Experimental Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…One is the pressure coefficient of boundary shear strength, and the other is the reduced (effective) elastic modulus of the contacting surfaces, * ; taking into account the effect of any tribo-film present. This makes a significant difference to the accuracy of predicted boundary friction [30] as it affects the calculated asperity load carrying capacity through equation (9).…”
Section: Nano-scale Experimental Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The AFM was then operated as a nano-indenter by loading the tip-surface contact and measuring the distance when the probe is lowered towards the surface, as well as the deflection of its cantilever support. More information on this procedure is reported by Umer et al [30]. The indentation measurements were conducted using RTESP-525 3 4 tips with a cantilever stiffness of 200 / and a nominal tip radius of 8 nm (measured to be 11.1 nm).…”
Section: Nano-scale Experimental Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations