2020
DOI: 10.1002/ncp.10553
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ASPEN Report on Nutrition Support Practice Processes With COVID‐19: The First Response

Abstract: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) has changed nutrition care processes in hospitals and in the home setting. This paper summarizes clinician reports on these changed processes, including overall nutrition care, nutrition assessment, enteral nutrition and parenteral nutrition care steps, and food and oral supplement delivery. Also included are teaching, logistics, and personnel issues around changes in the work environment. Use of safe, standardized, evidence‐based processes in the face of altered care patter… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0
14

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
40
0
14
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, knowledge gaps are addressed with articles based on theory, experience, prior evidence for extrapolation, and judgment, especially white papers and those in the gray literature. ASPEN 20,75 and the European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism 76 have already published reports on nutrition management with COVID‐19, with a follow‐up review by Minnelli et al, 77 but it is the strategic planning of nutrition studies to generate original, high‐quality data to close research gaps, which can efficiently advance knowledge and promote optimal, evidence‐based, comprehensive care.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, knowledge gaps are addressed with articles based on theory, experience, prior evidence for extrapolation, and judgment, especially white papers and those in the gray literature. ASPEN 20,75 and the European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism 76 have already published reports on nutrition management with COVID‐19, with a follow‐up review by Minnelli et al, 77 but it is the strategic planning of nutrition studies to generate original, high‐quality data to close research gaps, which can efficiently advance knowledge and promote optimal, evidence‐based, comprehensive care.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bolus feeding, however, is neither recommended nor feasible in COVID-19 patients, according to the ASPEN guidelines. 27,45 Protein is one of the most important macronutrients to meet the nutrition need of critically ill patients (both COVID-19 and non-COVID-19). At our center, we frequently used modular for our patients (with a composition of 15 g per 30 mL protein modular).…”
Section: Strategies For Nutrition Support Allocation During the Covidmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The documents reviewed indicated that if physical assessments of weight and height are not possible due to COVID-adapted ways of working, recalled and subjective measurements could be used as part of “MUST” [ 1 , 5 , 12 ]. Use of technology was also indicated to aid remote consultations and support screening [ 1 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 14 , 16 ]. Both BAPEN and the BDA highlighted that virtual consultations can gain useful and valid information to enable screening for malnutrition risk [ 5 , 12 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Upon hospital discharge, it appears uncommon for enteral tube feeding to continue in patients with COVID-19 into the community unless there is dysphagia or neurological dysfunction [ 3 ]. The NNG and ASPEN detailed some of the logistics involved in discharging a patient home on an enteral feed [ 11 , 16 ]. Most of the guidelines within our search timeframe were about the safety and practice of different methods of tube placement (nasogastric, gastrostomy, categorisation as aerosol generating procedures) in patients with COVID-19 and these were beyond the scope of this review.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation