2005
DOI: 10.1137/040604297
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aspects of Total Variation RegularizedL1Function Approximation

Abstract: Abstract. The total variation based image denoising model of Rudin, Osher, and Fatemi has been generalized and modified in many ways in the literature; one of these modifications is to use the L 1 norm as the fidelity term. We study the interesting consequences of this modification, especially from the point of view of geometric properties of its solutions. It turns out to have interesting new implications for data driven scale selection and multiscale image decomposition.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

12
485
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 591 publications
(504 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
12
485
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been extended recently to problems such as (1), in [10,8]. In image processing, the observation that (1) can be solved by nding the appropriate superlevel of the solution of (4) was also mentioned recently in [12,13].…”
Section: 4mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been extended recently to problems such as (1), in [10,8]. In image processing, the observation that (1) can be solved by nding the appropriate superlevel of the solution of (4) was also mentioned recently in [12,13].…”
Section: 4mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our computational method is designed for Θ as given in (1.3), or for any smooth and convex function Θ. Recently, data terms of the form Θ(v) = v 1 were shown to be useful if some data entries have to be preserved, which is appreciable, for instance, if n is impulse noise [39,14,27]. Our method is straightforward to extend to this situation, and we will indicate how this can be done.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, L 1 regularization on the function, or on its variations, have been developed to allow for more "compressed" reconstructions. These approaches are suitable for problems such as segmentation of images where boundaries are are sharp [16]. In these problems, the data is sparse in the sense that the boundaries in an image contain most of the information.…”
Section: Physical Constraints and Regularizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This class of methods relies on optimization that uses "compressive" L 1 regularization terms in the objective function that favor solutions that are compactly supported [16,17]. This type of regularization term is not derived from any fundamental physical law, but represents prior knowledge that the function to be recovered is sparse in content.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%