1965
DOI: 10.1016/s0065-3454(08)60055-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aspects of Stimulation and Organization in Approach/Withdrawal Processes Underlying Vertebrate Behavioral Development

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

13
123
0
2

Year Published

1975
1975
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 275 publications
(140 citation statements)
references
References 121 publications
13
123
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on this, we accept that some types of affective responses can be induced directly by somatic afferent cues and some require cognitive elaboration (Cacioppo, Berntson, & Klein, 1992). This view is also consistent with Schneirla's (1959Schneirla's ( , 1965 position that, in adult organisms, approach towards or withdrawal from stimuli (and, presumably, pleasure or displeasure, respectively) are driven by two interacting forces: (a) the fundamental tendency to approach weak and avoid intense stimuli, and (b) an increasingly influential superimposed component that reflects the learning and experience accumulated over the course of one's life. Within this hierarchical system, control can shift from more complex to simpler mechanisms and vice versa, depending on which can provide the appropriate response to a given situation (Berntson & Cacioppo, 2000;den Dulk, Heerebout, & Phaf, 2003;Toates, 1998Toates, , 2002.…”
Section: Fundamental Assumptionssupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on this, we accept that some types of affective responses can be induced directly by somatic afferent cues and some require cognitive elaboration (Cacioppo, Berntson, & Klein, 1992). This view is also consistent with Schneirla's (1959Schneirla's ( , 1965 position that, in adult organisms, approach towards or withdrawal from stimuli (and, presumably, pleasure or displeasure, respectively) are driven by two interacting forces: (a) the fundamental tendency to approach weak and avoid intense stimuli, and (b) an increasingly influential superimposed component that reflects the learning and experience accumulated over the course of one's life. Within this hierarchical system, control can shift from more complex to simpler mechanisms and vice versa, depending on which can provide the appropriate response to a given situation (Berntson & Cacioppo, 2000;den Dulk, Heerebout, & Phaf, 2003;Toates, 1998Toates, , 2002.…”
Section: Fundamental Assumptionssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Following Bartley (1970), Cabanac (1971Cabanac ( , 1995, Damasio (1995Damasio ( , 1999Damasio ( , 2000, Schulze (1995) and others, we believe that pleasure and displeasure are tied to the maintenance of homeostasis. We follow the rationale expressed in Schneirla's (1959Schneirla's ( , 1965 seminal theory of approachwithdrawal motivation, adopting the belief that both the absence of stimulation and the presence of intense stimulation are stressful. Based on this, Schneirla proposed that, at least for organisms at an early ontogenetic stage, low intensities of speciesspecific, survival-important stimulation tend to evoke approach reactions, whereas high intensities tend to evoke withdrawal reactions with reference to the source of the stimulation.…”
Section: Fundamental Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The greatest strength of following occurred when tactile stimulation was permitted during both preexposure and testing periods. It was concluded that the results support the hypothesis that tactile stimulation can facilitate both the initiation and maintenance of following behavior, and this is interpreted as being consistent with Schneirla's (1965) theory. Schneirla (1965) has suggested that the following response of young nidifugous birds has antecedents in embryo behavior, particularly in early movements of the head.…”
Section: Maureen Clements and Jon Uensupporting
confidence: 73%
“…It was concluded that the results support the hypothesis that tactile stimulation can facilitate both the initiation and maintenance of following behavior, and this is interpreted as being consistent with Schneirla's (1965) theory. Schneirla (1965) has suggested that the following response of young nidifugous birds has antecedents in embryo behavior, particularly in early movements of the head. He indicated that head movements initially come under control of low intensity, proximal stimuli, such as tactile stimuli, when the head of the embryo is raised and comes into contact with soft contractile tissues.…”
Section: Maureen Clements and Jon Uensupporting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation