1981
DOI: 10.1016/0301-4622(81)80019-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aspects of specific DNA-protein interaction; local bending of DNA molecules by in-register binding of the oligopeptide antibiotic distamycin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

1987
1987
1997
1997

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore our viscosity data on the individual modes on SN-6999 binding to three different DNA samples can be intetpreted as a preferential binding of this drug to dA · dT clusters in DNA Our data clearly demonstrate that both Nt and SN-6999 exhibit very similar dA · dT-cluster specificity which might originate from very similar energetical and conformational aspects in their binding to DNA The respective similarities may partially reside in corresponding functional H-donors ofNH groups and their favourable positioning in the ligand structure as discussed below. In contrast to these two ligands, Dst-3 exhibits a very different DNA response characterized by DNA helix bending, which obviously originates Downloaded by [Rutgers University] at 13:54 12 April 2015 from the lacking of the guanidino group on one end of the oligopeptide (26).…”
Section: Viscosimetric Studiesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Therefore our viscosity data on the individual modes on SN-6999 binding to three different DNA samples can be intetpreted as a preferential binding of this drug to dA · dT clusters in DNA Our data clearly demonstrate that both Nt and SN-6999 exhibit very similar dA · dT-cluster specificity which might originate from very similar energetical and conformational aspects in their binding to DNA The respective similarities may partially reside in corresponding functional H-donors ofNH groups and their favourable positioning in the ligand structure as discussed below. In contrast to these two ligands, Dst-3 exhibits a very different DNA response characterized by DNA helix bending, which obviously originates Downloaded by [Rutgers University] at 13:54 12 April 2015 from the lacking of the guanidino group on one end of the oligopeptide (26).…”
Section: Viscosimetric Studiesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The explanation may lie in the known deviations in DNA-binding effects between netropsin and distamycin A. The pronounced effect of distamycin A may also be understood on the basis of previously reported viscosity changes in hydrody namic studies (Reinert, 1981), from which it was concluded that netropsin causes stiffening and elongation of the bound DNA regions (Reinert, 1972), whereas distamycin A, showing a lower ing in viscosity within the low concentration range of the ligand, may produce local bending of the DNA molecule (Reinert, 1981).…”
Section: Dna Binding Ofdapi Distamycin a And Related Ligandsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…whereas distamycin A is bound to the DNA helix in a crystalline structure with a stable, propeller-twist con formation. These differences in binding conformation between netropsin and distamycin A, especially the bending of distamy cin A-bound DNA segments (Reinert, 1981), may bestow on distamycin A its greater capacity to exclude DAPI from its bind ing sites.…”
Section: Dna Binding Ofdapi Distamycin a And Related Ligandsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For non-cooperative DNA-ligand interaction and small a values, the 1/a(r) curves are almost symmetrical ( 4). Individual peculiarities are pointed out by the quantitative treatment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Details are given in the accompanying paper (2). For bending angles y~So, the change of persistence length is fairly sensitive to ligand-induced helix bending (4).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%