2015
DOI: 10.1016/s2212-5671(15)00368-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aspects of Occupational Morbidity in The Mining Sector

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the past, silicosis was an issue of concern in Romania, but the second major difference occurs in trends and forecasting, respectively an ascending number of cases in Israel, in contrast to the incidencereduction in Romania since 2010. This aparently decreasing trend of silicosis in Romania might be explained by a major shift in job exposure, coal mining sector becoming an almost extinct one [21,22]. It is not surprising, since coal workers' pneumoconiosis displayed a decreasing trend worldwide [23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In the past, silicosis was an issue of concern in Romania, but the second major difference occurs in trends and forecasting, respectively an ascending number of cases in Israel, in contrast to the incidencereduction in Romania since 2010. This aparently decreasing trend of silicosis in Romania might be explained by a major shift in job exposure, coal mining sector becoming an almost extinct one [21,22]. It is not surprising, since coal workers' pneumoconiosis displayed a decreasing trend worldwide [23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This aparently decreasing trend of silicosis in Romania might be explained by a major shift in job exposure, coal mining sector becoming an almost extinct one. [18,19] It is not surprising, since coal workers' pneumoconiosis displayed a decreasing trend worldwide. [20] Furthermore, the occupational setting was the second major difference resulted from comparative analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Переход на индивидуальном уровне от вероятностей и возникновения заболеваний к рискам здоровью работника проводится, исходя из классического определения, что риск -это совокупность вероятности и тяжести последствий. Другими словами, критичность риска определяется значением вероятности негативных ответов со стороны здоровья работника, умноженной на значение тяжести его последствий [23,24].…”
unclassified