1996
DOI: 10.1079/wps19960019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aspects of food intake restriction in young domestic fowl: metabolic and genetic considerations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
31
1
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
2
31
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Blood metabolites and liver hormone Nir et al (1996) reviewed the metabolic and hormonal changes in chickens as a consequence of feed restriction. In the present study, at the end of the feed restriction period, the TC levels in the feed restricted groups were higher than in the ad libitum group, in agreement with Ebeid et al (2012).…”
Section: Growth Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Blood metabolites and liver hormone Nir et al (1996) reviewed the metabolic and hormonal changes in chickens as a consequence of feed restriction. In the present study, at the end of the feed restriction period, the TC levels in the feed restricted groups were higher than in the ad libitum group, in agreement with Ebeid et al (2012).…”
Section: Growth Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, this growth rate is accompanied by increased body fat deposition, high mortality and high incidence of metabolic diseases and skeletal disorders (Zubair and Leeson, 1996). These situations most commonly occur with broilers that consume feed ad libitum when compared to feed restricted birds (Nir et al, 1996). Thus feed restriction has been proposed to reduce these problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our concerns with using lighting programs to limit access to feed, and thereby reduce feed intake are: (1) limiting early (before 10 d of age) feed access may negatively impact the development of the gastro intestinal tract (Dibner et al 1996) such that overall growth and ability to convert dietary nutrients to body weight are restricted; (2) use of lighting programs to restrict growth may result in increased bird injury during peak feeding when lights come on after an extended dark period [injury from scratching may increase incidence of cellulitis (Elfadil et al 1996), or muscle or skeletal injury reducing growth and value (Julian 2000)]; (3) reduced early growth may be too severe for broilers marketed at younger ages (<35 d) to fully recover, thus increasing days to market; and (4) gorging on feed (e.g., prior to extended dark periods) may increase gut growth (Joly 1994;Nir et al 1996) and thereby bird maintenance costs (Dibner et al 1996), and also increase feed passage rate through the gut and result in reduced feed utilization (May and Lott 1992).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%