2000
DOI: 10.1007/s004660000166
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aspects of finite element implementation of critical state models

Abstract: In this paper, some practical aspects of the ®nite element implementation of critical state models are discussed. Improved automatic algorithms for stress integration and load and time stepping are presented. The implementation of two generalized critical state soil models, with one described ®rst in this paper and the other recently published elsewhere, is discussed. The robustness and correctness of the proposed numerical algorithms are illustrated through both coupled and uncoupled analyses of geotechnical … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
100
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 212 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(29 reference statements)
2
100
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Hydrostatic pressure also greatly affects shear strength, and the strength envelopes were presented as open or closed parabolas (Qi and Ma 2007;Mortara 2008), and exponential or power functions (Hoek and Brown 1980;Yao et al 2015). Some researchers have also studied the shape function in the deviatoric plane under various complex stress states of geomaterials, and abundant results were obtained (Gudehus 1973;Argyris et al 1974;Podgorski 1985;Matsuoka et al 1999;Sheng et al 2000;Bigoni and Piccolroaz 2004;Mortara 2008). Zienkiewicz and Pande (1977) proposed a widely used nonlinear unified strength criterion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hydrostatic pressure also greatly affects shear strength, and the strength envelopes were presented as open or closed parabolas (Qi and Ma 2007;Mortara 2008), and exponential or power functions (Hoek and Brown 1980;Yao et al 2015). Some researchers have also studied the shape function in the deviatoric plane under various complex stress states of geomaterials, and abundant results were obtained (Gudehus 1973;Argyris et al 1974;Podgorski 1985;Matsuoka et al 1999;Sheng et al 2000;Bigoni and Piccolroaz 2004;Mortara 2008). Zienkiewicz and Pande (1977) proposed a widely used nonlinear unified strength criterion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This surface coincides with the Mohr-Coulomb hexagon at all vertices in the deviatoric plane, and the failure surface remains convex if α ≥ 0.6 (i.e. φ' ≤ 48.59° or M c ≤ 2) which is common for most clays (Sheng et al, 2000).…”
Section: Yield Surface and Plastic Potential In Deviatoric Planementioning
confidence: 60%
“…It is recognised that, for the case of cylindrical cavities with an anisotropic in situ stress state, they are a simplified version of the three-dimensional (3D) critical state variables. However, for the isotropic in situ stress state (which is the problem addressed by this paper), the possible error introduced by this simplification has been shown to be negligible by a rigorous numerical (finite-element) simulation (Sheng et al, 2000). This point was also considered and supported theoretically by Chen & Abousleiman (2012).…”
Section: Problem Definitionmentioning
confidence: 68%