Proceedings of the 9th Workshop on Computational Approaches to Subjectivity, Sentiment and Social Media Analysis 2018
DOI: 10.18653/v1/w18-6217
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aspect Based Sentiment Analysis into the Wild

Abstract: In this paper, we test state-of-the-art Aspect Based Sentiment Analysis (ABSA) systems trained on a widely used dataset on actual data. We created a new manually annotated dataset of user generated data from the same domain as the training dataset, but from other sources and analyse the differences between the new and the standard ABSA dataset. We then analyse the results in performance of different versions of the same system on both datasets. We also propose light adaptation methods to increase system robust… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Building Natural Language Processing models that perform well in the wild is still an open and challenging problem. It is well known that modern machine-learning models can be brittle, meaning that -even when achieving impressive performance on the evaluation set -their performance can degrade significantly when exposed to new examples with differences in vocabulary and writing style Jia and Liang, 2017;Brun and Nikoulina, 2018). This drop in performance when changing from domain D s to domain D t can be due to a variety of causes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Building Natural Language Processing models that perform well in the wild is still an open and challenging problem. It is well known that modern machine-learning models can be brittle, meaning that -even when achieving impressive performance on the evaluation set -their performance can degrade significantly when exposed to new examples with differences in vocabulary and writing style Jia and Liang, 2017;Brun and Nikoulina, 2018). This drop in performance when changing from domain D s to domain D t can be due to a variety of causes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used the published code to evaluate on both Res15 and Res16. • baseline-1-f lex: baseline-1-f lex (Brun and Nikoulina 2018) is a pipeline method for TASD. The source code is not provided and the paper only reported results on Res15 for both TASD and its subtask ASD.…”
Section: Comparison Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only the TASD task can capture this dual dependence, which aims to jointly detect target-aspect-sentiment triples. As far as we know, there is only one study (Brun and Nikoulina 2018) addressing the TASD task. It proposes a method relying on available parsers and domain-specific semantic lexicons, but this method performs poorly as shown in our experiments.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Baseline (Brun and Nikoulina, 2018) -38.10 TAS-LPM-CRF (Wan et al, 2020) 54.76 64.66 TAS-SW-CRF (Wan et al, 2020) 57.51 65.89 TAS-SW-TO (Wan et al, 2020) 58.09 65.44 all experiments. T5 closely follows the original encoder-decoder architecture of the Transformer model, with some slight differences such as different position embedding schemes.…”
Section: Rest15 Rest16mentioning
confidence: 99%