1999
DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1998.2401
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asparagine and glutamine: using hydrogen atom contacts in the choice of side-chain amide orientation 1 1Edited by J. Thornton

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
1,150
0
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,339 publications
(1,181 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
4
1,150
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The failure of both scoring functions can be attributed to the presence of the metal-ligand interactions in the active site. The Dreiding force field 41 was used for the PDF targets because the CFF 40 did not contain appropriate metal parameters. The poor results obtained here suggest that even the Drieding force field may not adequately handle the metalligand interactions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The failure of both scoring functions can be attributed to the presence of the metal-ligand interactions in the active site. The Dreiding force field 41 was used for the PDF targets because the CFF 40 did not contain appropriate metal parameters. The poor results obtained here suggest that even the Drieding force field may not adequately handle the metalligand interactions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The protein atoms were then typed using the CFF force field. 40 In the case of ePDF and sPDF, the binding site nickel ion was not bonded to the amino acid side chains and was typed as a Zn 2+ . The hydrogen positions were energy minimized using either the CFF or the Dreiding force field 41 in the absence of any ligands, while holding the heavy atoms of the protein backbone and side chains fixed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…42 Crystallization ligands were removed, and two hydroxy bridges between the irons were added to prepare the resting state dihydroxo-diiron(III) form of the enzyme. 42 The protein was protonated using reduce 49 on the basis of PropKa 3.1 results 50 for a pH of 7.8. Considering irons in the +3 oxidation state, the resulting structure had a charge of -15.…”
Section: Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%