2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.medcli.2016.06.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asociación de tumores del estroma gastrointestinal con otros tumores primarios. Propuesta de una nueva clasificación

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The localization of GIST-associated neoplasias with the highest frequency in the gastrointestinal tract, the urogenital, and female genital tract is consistent with previously reported findings[20,21]. In addition to a possible common underlying predisposition, the probability of detecting even small GIST during staging examinations for gastrointestinal tract tumors might be higher than in cases of, for example, lung or head and neck tumors.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The localization of GIST-associated neoplasias with the highest frequency in the gastrointestinal tract, the urogenital, and female genital tract is consistent with previously reported findings[20,21]. In addition to a possible common underlying predisposition, the probability of detecting even small GIST during staging examinations for gastrointestinal tract tumors might be higher than in cases of, for example, lung or head and neck tumors.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In 2016, Fernández et al proposed a classification based on the temporal association between GISTs and other malignancies, dividing the patients into four types according to two main factors: which tumor was the index one, and if the associated neoplasm was synchronic or metachronic [22]. In 2018, the same authors first reported a series of patients diagnosed with GISTs associated with other SPTs, comparing the different subgroups of associated GISTs according to the proposed classification.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%