2007
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-8-327
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ASMPKS: an analysis system for modular polyketide synthases

Abstract: Background: Polyketides are secondary metabolites of microorganisms with diverse biological activities, including pharmacological functions such as antibiotic, antitumor and agrochemical properties. Polyketides are synthesized by serialized reactions of a set of enzymes called polyketide synthase(PKS)s, which coordinate the elongation of carbon skeletons by the stepwise condensation of short carbon precursors. Due to their importance as drugs, the volume of data on polyketides is rapidly increasing and creatin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Oftentimes, the distribution of the ion of interest is interfacial and the producer is ambiguous. By employing analytical and biological approaches, such as microbial IMS, IMS of multiple time points (67), traditional solvent extraction, purification, and structural determination methods, such as tandem MS and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) (18,30,33,67,68), genetics and microbiology, 16S rRNA sequencing (54), established MALDI-TOF protocols (12,49,53), genome mining approaches (7,13,15,45,63) and predictive programs (2,3,16,33, 40,48,55,62,65,68), peptidogenomics (31), and literature and database searches (23, 52) (AntiMarin database, Dictionary of Natural Products, the National Institute of Standards and Technology [NIST] databases, and the SciFinder database), one can typically annotate microbial IMS data. Two main strategies to confirm the producing microbe and the resultant phenotype are genetic knockout and complementation studies or assays with purified compound, in combination with more IMS.…”
Section: Challenges In Microbial Imsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oftentimes, the distribution of the ion of interest is interfacial and the producer is ambiguous. By employing analytical and biological approaches, such as microbial IMS, IMS of multiple time points (67), traditional solvent extraction, purification, and structural determination methods, such as tandem MS and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) (18,30,33,67,68), genetics and microbiology, 16S rRNA sequencing (54), established MALDI-TOF protocols (12,49,53), genome mining approaches (7,13,15,45,63) and predictive programs (2,3,16,33, 40,48,55,62,65,68), peptidogenomics (31), and literature and database searches (23, 52) (AntiMarin database, Dictionary of Natural Products, the National Institute of Standards and Technology [NIST] databases, and the SciFinder database), one can typically annotate microbial IMS data. Two main strategies to confirm the producing microbe and the resultant phenotype are genetic knockout and complementation studies or assays with purified compound, in combination with more IMS.…”
Section: Challenges In Microbial Imsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each gene was functionally classified by assigning a "clusters of orthologous groups" (COG) number and corresponding COG category (Tatusov et al 2003) together with gene ontology numbers based on the best BLASTP results versus COG results. The motifs and domains of potential protein-coding sequences (CDSs) involved in secondary metabolites were documented based on intensive searches against publicly available databases and by using their application tools, including Pfam, PROSITE, NRPS-PKS (Ansari et al 2004), ASMPKS (Tae et al 2007), NORINE (Caboche et al 2008), and antiSMASH (Medema et al 2011). The tRNA and transfer-mRNA genes were predicted using the tRNAscan-SE (Lowe and Eddy 1997) and ARAGORN (Laslett and Canback 2004) programs, respectively.…”
Section: Genome Annotation and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional domains participate in the modification of the carbonyl group; these include ketoreductase (KR), dehydratase (DH) and enoyl reductase (ER) domains. A thioesterase (TE) domain catalyzes the release of the polyketide product from the last PKS participating in chain elongation [9][10][11].…”
Section: Inroductionmentioning
confidence: 99%