DOI: 10.11606/d.5.2018.tde-15032018-111201
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asma grave em crianças e adolescentes: análise da variação fenótica e fatores relacionados ao não controle clínico

Abstract: Aos meus amados pais Vagner I. Vergani e Ana Maria P. Vergani.Ao meu querido esposo Rodrigo P. Cuano.À minha família, meu alicerce. AGRADECIMENTOSA Deus referencial absoluto em minha vida, sem Sua presença esta pesquisa seria inviável, pois Dele é proveniente todo o Conhecimento.Ao querido amigo e Prof. Dr. Joaquim Carlos Rodrigues pela orientação inegavelmente competente e segura, pelos valiosos estímulos e sugestões concedidas, a ele minha admiração.Ao Rodrigo, meu marido, pela sua paciência, compreensão, am… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the current study, we considered the cut-off point of 60 minutes for the saccharin test in order to make the diagnosis of PCD, while Adde et al (cited in Vergani) presented that the cut-off point of 30 minutes has the sensitivity of 95%, and this rate decreases to 75% by the consideration of 60 minutes as the cut-off time for positive saccharin test outcomes (14). The notable low sensitivity of this test in the current study may be attributed to the used cut-off value.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the current study, we considered the cut-off point of 60 minutes for the saccharin test in order to make the diagnosis of PCD, while Adde et al (cited in Vergani) presented that the cut-off point of 30 minutes has the sensitivity of 95%, and this rate decreases to 75% by the consideration of 60 minutes as the cut-off time for positive saccharin test outcomes (14). The notable low sensitivity of this test in the current study may be attributed to the used cut-off value.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%