2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvlc.2012.05.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ASM2Bogor: An approach for verification of models specified through Asmeta language

Abstract: Nowadays, publish-subscribe (pub-sub) and event-based architecture are frequently used for developing loosely coupled distributed systems. Hence, it is desirable to find a proper solution to specify different systems through these architectures. Abstract state machine (ASM) is a useful means to visually and formally model pub-sub and eventbased architectures. However, modeling per se is not enough since the designers want to be able to verify the designed models. As the model checking is a proper approach to v… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(15 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A tool, AsmetaSMV, that enriches the ASMETA framework with the capabilities of the model checker NuSMV to verify properties of given ASM models is presented in [4]. Moreover, in [39] the authors present an approach to verify ASM models, specified in terms of the Asmeta language, using the model checker Bogor.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A tool, AsmetaSMV, that enriches the ASMETA framework with the capabilities of the model checker NuSMV to verify properties of given ASM models is presented in [4]. Moreover, in [39] the authors present an approach to verify ASM models, specified in terms of the Asmeta language, using the model checker Bogor.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerning automatic analysis, several examples of model checking techniques applied to ASMs exist, e.g. (Del Castillo and Winter, 2000), (Farahbod et al, 2007b), (Arcaini et al, 2010), (Rafe and Doostali, 2012). However, the Turing-completeness of the formalism (Gurevich, 2000) causes an unavoidable drawback: properties are, in general, undecidable, so the formal verification of ASM specifications cannot be fully automatized (Spielmann, 1999).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%