2003
DOI: 10.1525/sp.2003.50.2.273
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asking for Bread, Receiving a Stone: The Rise and Fall of Religious Ideologies in Chicago's Eight-Hour Movement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The success of a frame is measured by its resonance; in turn, resonance is primarily the interactive function of its credibility, empirical commensurability, and salience to audience experience (Benford and Snow, 2000a: 619-22). Resonance is essentially an ecological variable that situates framing processes within specific socio-historical contexts (Berbrier, 1998;Kubal, 1998;Mirola, 2003). Resonant framing means using contextually available cultural tools-relevant and salient metaphors, recognizable stereotypes, and familiar story templates-to render news stories immediately accessible and satisfying to audiences.…”
Section: Media Narratives and The Productiodreproduction Of Stigmasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The success of a frame is measured by its resonance; in turn, resonance is primarily the interactive function of its credibility, empirical commensurability, and salience to audience experience (Benford and Snow, 2000a: 619-22). Resonance is essentially an ecological variable that situates framing processes within specific socio-historical contexts (Berbrier, 1998;Kubal, 1998;Mirola, 2003). Resonant framing means using contextually available cultural tools-relevant and salient metaphors, recognizable stereotypes, and familiar story templates-to render news stories immediately accessible and satisfying to audiences.…”
Section: Media Narratives and The Productiodreproduction Of Stigmasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A frame is considered successful if its audience accepts and engages with its interpretive framework (Benford 1997), and thus is conducive to achieving organizational aims (Haydu 1999). In the context of social movement organizations, success is often defined simply when a frame helps a movement realize its goals (Polletta 1998; Mirola 2003). By extension, state official frames are successful when they help a state realize its end goal: retaining legitimacy among the citizenry.…”
Section: Official Frames and Frame Resonancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, while the failure of a frame is not a death knell per se, lack of frame resonance can jeopardize the realization of organizational goals (Hallgrímsdóttir 2006). Collective action frames are considered “failures” when competing frames become dominant and push the failed frames out of the movement's discourse (Mirola 2003; Hallgrímsdóttir 2006). In her examination of the frames utilized by same‐sex‐marriage advocates in Hawaii, Hull (2001) denoted frame failure with the passage of anti‐same‐sex‐marriage legislation.…”
Section: Official Frames and Frame Resonancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The frames and attendant claims used by activists to define breast cancer as a public problem had a high degree of cultural resonance with their audiences, a condition necessary for the success of a social movement (Epstein 1997, Johnston et al 1994, Mirola 2003, Snow et al 1986). This analysis expands the range of movement activities to include the public speech actions (Johnston 1995) of activists by examining the public performance of breast cancer activist discourse.…”
Section: Framing and Health Social Movementsmentioning
confidence: 99%