Abstract:Science is about asking questions but not all science courses provide students with opportunities to practice this essential skill. We give students ownership of the processes of asking and answering questions to help them take greater responsibility for their own learning and to better understand the process of science with its inherent uncertainty. Peer learning activities throughout the course embed multidirectional feedback within and between students and instructors. Students are our partners in the desig… Show more
“…Support for, and expectations of, student learning through the provision of a feedback rubric using this taxonomy has proven to be successful. Feedback is given in partnership and requires reciprocal engagement by the student and in this model, lecturers and students have as much responsibility as the other (Rivers, et al, 2017). Other research provides evidence that feedback promotes academic success.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It will also show how socially constructed learning to produce quality outcomes can be developed. Therefore, instead of lecturers transmitting information and content, students are engaged in the learning process to meet their learning outcomes (Rivers et al, 2017). The role of learning communities to support the development of student initial learning in writing multiple-choice questions in the online space will be discussed.…”
It is widely recognised that the development of higher order thinking skills is a fundamental goal of higher education. There are a variety of online tools that assist the development of student higher order thinking. In this paper, a process of scaffolding for the writing of higher-order questions enabled through peer learning activities is explored. Data collected over two years across five cohorts shows that there was an overall statistically significant improvement in the number of higher-order questions produced by students at the end of each unit. The findings reveal a viable peer teaching tool that can easily be embedded into existing programmes to develop the necessary critical thinking skills for higher education students.
“…Support for, and expectations of, student learning through the provision of a feedback rubric using this taxonomy has proven to be successful. Feedback is given in partnership and requires reciprocal engagement by the student and in this model, lecturers and students have as much responsibility as the other (Rivers, et al, 2017). Other research provides evidence that feedback promotes academic success.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It will also show how socially constructed learning to produce quality outcomes can be developed. Therefore, instead of lecturers transmitting information and content, students are engaged in the learning process to meet their learning outcomes (Rivers et al, 2017). The role of learning communities to support the development of student initial learning in writing multiple-choice questions in the online space will be discussed.…”
It is widely recognised that the development of higher order thinking skills is a fundamental goal of higher education. There are a variety of online tools that assist the development of student higher order thinking. In this paper, a process of scaffolding for the writing of higher-order questions enabled through peer learning activities is explored. Data collected over two years across five cohorts shows that there was an overall statistically significant improvement in the number of higher-order questions produced by students at the end of each unit. The findings reveal a viable peer teaching tool that can easily be embedded into existing programmes to develop the necessary critical thinking skills for higher education students.
“…While collaboration requires time and tactful negotiation, this challenging work often leads to rich learning. Collaboration between students can support them in taking greater responsibility for their learning, help them develop better assessment literacy, and foster a greater ability to think scientifically (Rivers et al, 2017). We can help students better understand the value of working together while providing them with opportunities to collaborate in meaningful ways with autonomy, independence, and choice (Healey et al, 2016).…”
In this paper, we describe how academic colleagues from different fields used a theoretical framework for authentic assessment as the starting point for meaningful conversations about our teaching practices. We re-envision Hutchings’ (2000) taxonomy of SoTL questions as a fluid conversational cycle rather than a system of classification. Using the eight elements of authentic assessment as outlined by Ashford-Rowe et al. (2014) as a theoretical framework, we engage with the research literature, reflect on what is and what works from our previous teaching and learning experiences, and propose ideas and questions for what is possible moving forward.
“…Students may fill various roles, from consultant to co-researcher to pedagogical co-designer (Bovill et al, 2016), and the nature of student involvement may vary as well (Bovill, 2017;Konings et al, 2017). In recent years, literature addressing students as partners in STEM courses has been particularly vibrant, with collaborations yielding benefits in curriculum design (Charkoudian et al, 2015;Rivers et al, 2017). Partnerships with students have led to improvements in equity and inclusivity in STEM (Bunnell et al, 2021;Chukwu & Jones, 2020;Cook-Sather et al, 2021;Latin, 2022;Narayanan & Abbot, 2020), addressing barriers to belonging and thriving in disciplines where White and Asian male students are overrepresented (National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics [NCSES], 2019).…”
The most effective teaching and learning environments are those in which students are involved as active partners with faculty, and the greatest impact occurs when faculty go beyond asking students for feedback and instead involve them in design, production, and implementation. In this paper, we explore the process of student-faculty co-creation by presenting a specific case involving students as partners in the redesign of an introductory chemistry laboratory course to incorporate more group learning, support students’ skill development, and increase students’ sense of belonging in chemistry. This case study investigates how faculty can set up and structure a successful co-design partnership and attend to potential challenges as well as how educational developers and teaching centers can work in partnership with faculty and students to design or redesign courses.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.