1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3991(97)00109-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ASIC-based event-driven 2D digital electron counter for TEM imaging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Implementation of counting is easier in hybrid pixel sensors (HPSs) that are obtained by connecting a pixellated silicon detector with separate readout electronics by bump bonding. Operation of counting HPSs allows virtually noiseless creation of images; however, pixel sizes are usually in the order of a few tens of mm and construction of the detector requires troublesome bump bonding [6][7][8]. HPSs represent amount of material (readout chip, high Z material bump bonds, etc.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Implementation of counting is easier in hybrid pixel sensors (HPSs) that are obtained by connecting a pixellated silicon detector with separate readout electronics by bump bonding. Operation of counting HPSs allows virtually noiseless creation of images; however, pixel sizes are usually in the order of a few tens of mm and construction of the detector requires troublesome bump bonding [6][7][8]. HPSs represent amount of material (readout chip, high Z material bump bonds, etc.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, large-pixel, silicon-based detectors are under development for high energy physics experiments and for x-ray crystallography, and have also been tested for electron microscopy. 16 These devices provide a singleelectron signal that is well above the noise background, so that the SNR is extremely high. The dynamic range can be well above 10 6 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the process, we also observed a high dynamic range for imaging, with linear response from our minimum tested exposure of 0.225 e − /pixel to more than 1500× this value at 342 e − /pixel. Indeed, the dynamic range of direct electron detection for a typical cryo-EM exposure should be even higher than for a CCD, since the signal from the direct detector is continually read and integrated in software, rather than being hardware integrated in pixels wells over the entire exposure time (Fan et al, 1998). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%