Asian development after the Asian Drama

Kozul‐Wright, Richard; Poon, Daniel

doi:10.35188/unu-wider/2018/577-0

Cited by 5 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The idea of 'deals and development', where understandings between governments and business explain the political dynamics underlying episodes of rapid growth in some Asian and African countries, is developed byPritchett et al (2018).26 Some of the papers in this study consider the role of the state in the process of development in Asia directly-seeEvans and Heller (2018),Bhaduri (2018),Khan (2018), andDuara (2018). Some of the cross-country thematic papers do so indirectly in relation to their respective themes-seeVos (2018),Chang and Zach (2018),Mundle (2018),Kozul- Wright and Poon (2018), van der Hoeven (2018), andWan and Wang (2018). Country-studies and sub-region studies…”

mentioning

confidence: 85%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Rethinking Asian Drama

Nayyar¹

2018

WIDER Working Paper

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. Terms of use: Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your personal and scholarly purposes. You are not to copy documents for public or commercial purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. If the documents have been made available under an Open Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence.

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 85%

“…In some spheres, the Philippines, with its Spanish colonial legacy, resembled Latin American countries. 30 SeeChang and Zach (2018) andKozul-Wright and Poon (2018).31 The following discussion on economic openness draws upon earlier work of the author(Nayyar 2013).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Rethinking Asian Drama

Nayyar¹

2018

WIDER Working Paper

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The G7 has also called for an overhaul of the principle of special and differential treatment (SDT), essentially calling for a contraction in privileges with more targeted and specific measures. SDT was adopted to allow developing countries to benefit from non-reciprocal tariff reductions and granted some special rights and privileges to them to mitigate the disadvantages they face in the international trading system and to help them with implementing multilateral trade agreements (Kozul-Wright et al, 2019)…”

Section: Trade and Environment In The Wto And Other Trade Agreementsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Understanding the Linkages Between Financial Markets and Sustainable Economic Development

Maharajabdinul

2024

AEFS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study explores the intricate relationship between financial markets and sustainable economic development, aiming to elucidate the dynamics, challenges, and opportunities at the intersection of finance and sustainability. Employing a multidisciplinary approach, the research synthesizes insights from economics, finance, environmental studies, sociology, and political science to provide a comprehensive analysis. The purpose is to examine how financial market activities influence the pursuit of sustainable economic development and vice versa. Methodologically, the study employs a literature review to synthesize existing research and identify gaps in understanding. Findings reveal that while financial markets play a crucial role in capital allocation and resource mobilization, they also pose challenges such as environmental degradation, social inequality, and systemic risks. Regulatory frameworks and institutional arrangements are identified as critical factors shaping the impact of financial markets on sustainability outcomes. The discussion highlights the need for a holistic approach that integrates financial market reform, regulatory enforcement, and stakeholder engagement to address these challenges. Implications include the importance of aligning financial incentives with sustainability objectives, enhancing the resilience of financial systems, and fostering collaborative partnerships among stakeholders. Overall, the study contributes to both theoretical understanding and practical insights for policymakers, practitioners, and scholars navigating the complex terrain of finance and sustainability.

show abstract

“…The chapter concludes with remarks on the implications ¹ Several studies have explored the extent to which China's rapid catch-up growth follows the East Asian developmental state model; using different metrics the studies have presented a varied picture, often reflecting the time and place of the authors concerned-see Knight, 2014;Boltho and Weber, 2009;Baek, 2005;Pearson, 2005;Lee et al, 2002;Breslin, 1996. ² Similar to these concepts, Gunnar Myrdal used the term 'operational controls'. See Kozul-Wright and Poon (2018).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

How Nations Learn

2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Authored by eminent scholars, the volume aims to generate interest and debate among policymakers, practitioners, and researchers on the complexity of learning and catch-up, particularly for twenty-first century late-late developers. The volume explores technological learning at the firm level, policy learning by the state, and the cumulative and multifaceted nature of the learning process, which encompasses learning by doing, by experiment, emulation, innovation, and leapfrogging. Why is catch-up rare? And why have some nations succeeded while others failed? What are the prospects for successful learning and catch-up in the twenty-first century? These are pertinent questions that require further research and in-depth analysis. The World Bank estimates that out of the 101 middle-income economies in 1960, only thirteen became high income by 2008. This volume examines how nations learn by reviewing key structural and contingent factors that contribute to dynamic learning and catch-up. Rejecting both the one-size-fits-all approach and the agnosticism that all nations are unique and different, the volume uses historical as well as firm-level, industry-level, and country-level evidence and experiences to identify the sources and drivers of successful learning and catch-up and the lessons for late-latecomer countries. Building on the latecomer-advantage perspective, the volume shows that what is critical for dynamic learning and catch-up is not learning per se but the intensity of learning, robust industrial policies, and the pace and direction of learning. Equally important are the passion to learn, long-term strategic vision, and understanding the context in which successful learning occurs.

show abstract

Asian development after the Asian Drama

Cited by 5 publications

References 17 publications

Rethinking Asian Drama

Rethinking Asian Drama

Understanding the Linkages Between Financial Markets and Sustainable Economic Development

How Nations Learn

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About